Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(9,183 posts)
15. Good readers don't
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 03:52 AM
Yesterday

harangue authors over the reader not being up to speed with common usage or feeling common usage needs to be spelled out for them rather than the reader taking responsibility for their own lack of knowledge of commonly used terms. The fact that you keep arguing the idea that usage of GQP or Q anon as a subject are somehow obscure shows that you clearly have still not done any research.

Since you appear unable or unwilling to do basic research on the subject here are some quick references obtained in less than one minute:

From search referencing britannica.com

"QAnon has been referenced extensively on social media platforms. From October 2017 to June 2020, over 69 million tweets, 487,000 Facebook posts, and 281,000 Instagram posts mentioned QAnon-related phrases or hashtags. This indicates a significant presence and engagement with the conspiracy theory across various online platforms."

A little more of the history at this link:

https://medium.com/insider/the-history-of-qanon-b73d644cfbac

Even more discussion about GQP and it having prominence in political discussion about the GOP and their embrace of Q anon:

https://scout.yahoo.com/chat/019e9193-6113-72d7-88a0-a7afc739f50e-a?fr2=p%3As%2Cv%3Aw%2Cm%3AgenAiSum%2Cpos%3A1

Since you find my writing so burdensome to read I suggest you don't bother.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The GQP opposition to the...»Reply #15