Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Alaska

-none

(1,884 posts)

2. I read a few days ago that Alaska would be a clean sweep for Hillary.

Reply to Bugenhagen (Original post)

Sat Mar 26, 2016, 03:38 PM

Mar 2016

Apparently that was just more scare tactics from them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

District five in Fairbanks just went 100% for Bernie [View all] Bugenhagen Mar 2016 OP

Wow...clean sweep? n/t Hydra Mar 2016 #1

Yep Bugenhagen Mar 2016 #5

But but, what about the math? Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #12

Can we just appreciate a good win witbout poking sticks at Hillary supporters passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #20

+1000 shireen Mar 2016 #30

Shireen, I never took your reponse personally - and Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #41

Thank You. I couldn't agree more rpannier Mar 2016 #31

Then I should apologise; I was sickly vengeful when I wrote that. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #39

I'm sure everyone appreciates your apology passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #46

Unlike Hillary most of us can't afford to buy surrogates to do our stick poking for us. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #42

I read a few days ago that Alaska would be a clean sweep for Hillary. -none Mar 2016 #2

Scare tactics in their case Hydra Mar 2016 #11

Really? retrowire Mar 2016 #13

Yeah, sure n/t sharp_stick Mar 2016 #19

alaska was huge for bernie since forever roguevalley Mar 2016 #25

One caucus voter had a photo showing 67 for Bernie, ONE for HRC Lorien Mar 2016 #3

Go Alaska!! haikugal Mar 2016 #4

what's the 15% viability thing? greymouse Mar 2016 #6

Yes. In Alaska, but I don't think in Washington. Nt lostnfound Mar 2016 #7

Amy candidate who doesn't get fifteen percent Bugenhagen Mar 2016 #9

Wonderful! Thank you! Go, Bernie... GO! AzDar Mar 2016 #8

HEADLINE: "Hillary Is Not Viable Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #10

Ouch. That's gonna sting. polly7 Mar 2016 #14

Alaska was just called for Bernie! elljay Mar 2016 #15

District Five? Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #16

Seems better than District 9 FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #22

LOL! Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #28

Winning District 9 Looks Quite Consequential rpannier Mar 2016 #33

Hungry For Power Games rpannier Mar 2016 #32

These kind of numbers will open eyes in less liberal states or even more conservative states too. Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #17

especially when people think AK is roguevalley Mar 2016 #26

Right on!!!!! Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #34

Wowzers libodem Mar 2016 #18

Good job, Fairbanks. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #21

I KNEW this was going to happen! Plucketeer Mar 2016 #23

I thought Alaska was Republican? zalinda Mar 2016 #24

it is Skittles Mar 2016 #27

Maybe not, if Sanders is the nominee... modestybl Mar 2016 #36

I think Johnson was the only Democrat they went for, for president Skittles Mar 2016 #37

This year could be different. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #44

They could flip this year. noamnety Mar 2016 #40

I just wish we had more options Skittles Mar 2016 #48

With 72%counted, 79% Sanders, 20.8% Hillary. Hortensis Mar 2016 #29

With "100%" precincts reporting, Sanders 81.6%, Clinton 18.4% modestybl Mar 2016 #35

Very cool! SoapBox Mar 2016 #38

Bernin in Fairbanks. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #43

Where are the Hillary supporters? AlbertCat Mar 2016 #45

No Candidate In History billhicks76 Mar 2016 #47