Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(54,324 posts)
6. the problem isn't the name. once upon a time, they specifically claimed it was water from a natural spring
Wed Jan 1, 2025, 01:08 PM
Jan 1

businesses are usually given a lot of leeway in terms of their names and branding. it's specific claims that are a problem.

there are many companies in central new jersey with "princeton" in their name that have nothing to do with the university, because there's a town called "princeton". obviously they are leveraging the prestige of the university, but they can simply say they named themselves after the town, not the university. it's only if they claim to have something to do with the university when they don't, then it becomes a problem.

similarly, there's an area in portland, maine called "poland spring", and the company can brand itself after that area. no problem, even though they are obviously insinuating that their product has something to do with a natural spring.

but the problem, and the lawsuit, is based on specific claims they used to make (but no longer make, afaik), that their water did indeed come from a natural spring.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge will not dismiss la...»Reply #6