Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Polybius

(18,727 posts)

17. And 9-0 at that

Reply to Voltaire2 (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 01:08 PM

14 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DeepWinter

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden Says Equal Rights Amendment Is 'Law of the Land' [View all] Tennessee Hillbilly 16 hrs ago OP

Will ERA protect the rights of Trans? no_hypocrisy 16 hrs ago #1

I doubt it DeepWinter 11 hrs ago #21

The SCROTUS will nullify this in about 3 days. nt. Voltaire2 16 hrs ago #2

Nothing to nullify at this point FBaggins 16 hrs ago #4

And 9-0 at that Polybius 14 hrs ago #17

Here is the STATEMENT BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago #3

Statement of President Joe Biden on the Equal Rights Amendment LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #5

Well Done Joe!!! MayReasonRule 16 hrs ago #6

Sadly, SCantiGOP 15 hrs ago #7

Yes. DavidDvorkin 15 hrs ago #8

On what basis? There's no time limit in the Constitution. pnwmom 15 hrs ago #9

Don't Think That's Been Litigated. GB_RN 15 hrs ago #11

Every amendment passed since prohibition had a deadline MichMan 14 hrs ago #12

The time limit itself was unconstitutional, then the whole Amendment might be Polybius 14 hrs ago #15

Where in the Constitution does it say a state's approval can be rescinded? nt pnwmom 9 hrs ago #26

Where does it say it can't? madville 8 hrs ago #29

The same page that it says that they can't n/t Polybius 4 hrs ago #33

It doesn't prohibit one either MichMan 9 hrs ago #28

Congress can make its own rules for its own conduct. Igel 6 hrs ago #31

I wouldn't say sadly, because it might be 9-0 Polybius 11 hrs ago #24

If it has been the 'Law of the Land' for almost five years now, why hasn't anyone filed a lawsuit citing it? Jose Garcia 15 hrs ago #10

Do it, Joe! One last home run! calimary 14 hrs ago #13

I think Biden is taunting Trump who will bear the fault if he wipes it out. CTyankee 13 hrs ago #19

Cite Article IV of the Consitution. Igel 6 hrs ago #32

Huh, I also though Roe vs Wade was also 'Law of the Land'. republianmushroom 14 hrs ago #14

It was "settled law," until it wasn't. (n/t) thesquanderer 13 hrs ago #18

That's what the lying supreme court justices, appointed by the most notorious liar in history, said UNDER OATH. BComplex 11 hrs ago #23

They didn't lie. They danced around the question with non-answers. thesquanderer 10 hrs ago #25

I understand that. But they knew what they were being asked. Playing verbal gymnastics, under oath, BComplex 3 hrs ago #34

So how come it's not on Wiki yet? Polybius 14 hrs ago #16

Not enough fanfare intrepidity 13 hrs ago #20

That's what they said about Roe... sakabatou 11 hrs ago #22

Post removed Post removed 9 hrs ago #27

It's a nice gesture madville 7 hrs ago #30