Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

CTyankee

(65,499 posts)

19. I think Biden is taunting Trump who will bear the fault if he wipes it out.

Reply to calimary (Reply #13)

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 01:54 PM

Jan 17

there's a whole new generation of women who may not be political now but sure would be if the Trump administration just cancelled their rights. It was the right thing to do morally and politically. Thank you, President Biden!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

calimary

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden Says Equal Rights Amendment Is 'Law of the Land' [View all] Tennessee Hillbilly Jan 17 OP

Will ERA protect the rights of Trans? no_hypocrisy Jan 17 #1

I doubt it DeepWinter Jan 17 #21

The SCROTUS will nullify this in about 3 days. nt. Voltaire2 Jan 17 #2

Nothing to nullify at this point FBaggins Jan 17 #4

And 9-0 at that Polybius Jan 17 #17

Here is the STATEMENT BumRushDaShow Jan 17 #3

Statement of President Joe Biden on the Equal Rights Amendment LetMyPeopleVote Jan 17 #5

Well Done Joe!!! MayReasonRule Jan 17 #6

Sadly, SCantiGOP Jan 17 #7

Yes. DavidDvorkin Jan 17 #8

On what basis? There's no time limit in the Constitution. pnwmom Jan 17 #9

Don't Think That's Been Litigated. GB_RN Jan 17 #11

Every amendment passed since prohibition had a deadline MichMan Jan 17 #12

The time limit itself was unconstitutional, then the whole Amendment might be Polybius Jan 17 #15

Where in the Constitution does it say a state's approval can be rescinded? nt pnwmom Jan 17 #26

Where does it say it can't? madville Jan 17 #29

The same page that it says that they can't n/t Polybius Jan 17 #33

It doesn't prohibit one either MichMan Jan 17 #28

Congress can make its own rules for its own conduct. Igel Jan 17 #31

I wouldn't say sadly, because it might be 9-0 Polybius Jan 17 #24

If it has been the 'Law of the Land' for almost five years now, why hasn't anyone filed a lawsuit citing it? Jose Garcia Jan 17 #10

Do it, Joe! One last home run! calimary Jan 17 #13

I think Biden is taunting Trump who will bear the fault if he wipes it out. CTyankee Jan 17 #19

Cite Article IV of the Consitution. Igel Jan 17 #32

Huh, I also though Roe vs Wade was also 'Law of the Land'. republianmushroom Jan 17 #14

It was "settled law," until it wasn't. (n/t) thesquanderer Jan 17 #18

That's what the lying supreme court justices, appointed by the most notorious liar in history, said UNDER OATH. BComplex Jan 17 #23

They didn't lie. They danced around the question with non-answers. thesquanderer Jan 17 #25

I understand that. But they knew what they were being asked. Playing verbal gymnastics, under oath, BComplex Jan 17 #34

I agree. But they were smart enough with their answers to avoid perjury. thesquanderer Jan 18 #35

So how come it's not on Wiki yet? Polybius Jan 17 #16

Not enough fanfare intrepidity Jan 17 #20

That's what they said about Roe... sakabatou Jan 17 #22

Post removed Post removed Jan 17 #27

It's a nice gesture madville Jan 17 #30

I heard this wouldn't be finalized because the archivist wouldn't accept it LymphocyteLover Jan 18 #36

the fate of the amendment seems very much up in the air LymphocyteLover Jan 18 #37