Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: "Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(102,947 posts)31. Well, this is why the change in wording means something
The 1866 act does seem to have meant "Native Americans aren't citizens, and neither are those 'subject to another power'" so they might say under that dual citizen parents didn't count, but since, for the constitutional amendment, they changed it to "subject to US law", it meant everyone in the USA (including those with no right to be there).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
"Excluding Indians": Trump admin questions Native Americans' birthright citizenship in court [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 23
OP
Not even three days in office and Trump has already created more chaos than he did his entire first term.
sop
Jan 23
#29
Yes, it's absolutely ridiculous. Native Americans, the indigenous people here should sit in judgement...
brush
Jan 23
#56
So their argument is "they changed the wording, so it must mean the same as the old wording"
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 23
#2
They're going back to the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the groundwork of the 14th Amendment, which excluded Native American
LeftInTX
Jan 23
#49
I hope it makes sense. They're trying to argue that people born to non-citizens are non-citizens.
LeftInTX
Jan 23
#52
The heritage foundation lawyer was trying to make an argument why he thinks non-citizens
LeftInTX
Jan 24
#78
On June 2, 1924, Congress enacted the Indian Citizenship Act, which granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 24
#95
Seems to me that if undocumented immigrants aren't subject to the jurisdiction of the United States...
AZSkiffyGeek
Jan 24
#97
I would not stop them also-the white man took their land and have the nerve to treat them
Stargazer99
Jan 23
#69
My mind is running through all the scenes of the most violent "Indian" attacks on racist white characters
hlthe2b
Jan 23
#5
Still calling native peoples "Indians." And "who wants to pay 40,000 to bury a Mexican"? He is a domestic terrorist.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 23
#24
I'm sick over all the people he is harming, and all the people he will harm as time goes by.
Solly Mack
Jan 23
#39
Insane. What is his point. Native Americans are NATIVE. Here before any other race.
Fla Dem
Jan 23
#32
Under Trump, Native Americans aren't Americans. No wonder he's an Andrew Jackson fan.
surfered
Jan 23
#38
Pretty sure Native Americans already know they aren't "citizens" and never have been.
malthaussen
Jan 23
#44
Native Americans have been citizens since 1924, under a law signed by Calvin Coolidge:
Liberty Belle
Jan 24
#77
So, Trump is declaring that Native Americans are NOT US citizens?? Is this what he is saying?
riversedge
Jan 23
#47
Yes! This was likely someone trying to justify that children born to non citizens were not granted citizenship by the
LeftInTX
Jan 23
#67
Are all natural born children American citizens? No... there is one exception. Children of diplomats.
Norrrm
Jan 23
#60
Maybe Rump is trying to get in Kristi Noem's pants. As far as I know, the puppy killer is still banned from seven out of
LaMouffette
Jan 23
#61
When they're here in the US they are not subject to a foreign power unless they are working here for said foreign power.
cstanleytech
Jan 23
#62
I know that, thanks. Just pointing out that the person calling them Indians is an ignoramus.
Sparky 1
Jan 24
#85
He's citing old laws against Native Americans to justify Trump's EO against non-citizens.
LeftInTX
Jan 24
#82
"The Salon article fails to mention that Native Americans were granted full citizenship in 1924
BumRushDaShow
Jan 24
#87
The legal justification for TFG's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order is sad and wrong
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 24
#96