Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Republican files impeachment against judge who ruled against Trump deportations [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(173,748 posts)18. Republicans waste little time acting on Trump's judicial impeachment demand
The problem isnt just that Trump called for the impeachment of a federal judge. Its also the House Republicans who followed the presidential directive.
Problem: Trump calling for the impeachment of a federal judge who's done nothing wrong.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-03-19T12:46:21.254Z
Bigger problem: House Republicans unveiling *four* impeachment resolutions targeting federal judges who've done nothing wrong. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
Problem: Trump calling for the impeachment of a federal judge who's done nothing wrong.
Bigger problem: House Republicans unveiling *four* impeachment resolutions targeting federal judges who've done nothing wrong.
Bigger problem: House Republicans unveiling *four* impeachment resolutions targeting federal judges who've done nothing wrong.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-waste-little-time-acting-trumps-judicial-impeachment-deman-rcna197031
Less than one day later, Trump crossed a line hed never crossed before: On heels of a Justice Department speech in which he suggested criticizing judges should be seen as totally illegal, the president called U.S. District Judge James Boasberg a Radical Left Lunatic, a troublemaker and an agitator. Trump concluded, This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!....
To the extent that reality still has meaning, none of the targeted judges have done anything to suggest theyve gone rogue. But even if Trump has come to the opposite conclusion, the answer to his question is simple: As Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts reminded Trump, he can simply appeal rulings he believes were wrong.
But no matter how serious the White House is about judicial impeachments, its not up to Trump or his team to execute such a plan: Presidents have literally no formal or procedural role in the process. Rather, that power rests with Congress where a group of far-right Republicans apparently interpreted Trumps appeal as a directive. Axios reported:
The Texas Republicans impeachment resolution was unveiled with five co-sponsors: Republican Reps. Eli Crane of Arizona, Buddy Carter of Georgia, Mike Collins of Georgia, Barry Moore of Alabama and Andrew Clyde of Georgia......
House GOP leaders, of course, already have their hands full, and they dont seem overly eager to launch impeachment crusades against judges whove done nothing wrong, and whod never be removed by two-thirds of the Senate.
Whats unclear, however, is just how much effort the president intends to invest in this, and what Republican leaders on Capitol Hill will do if Trump decides this is a real priority. Watch this space.
To the extent that reality still has meaning, none of the targeted judges have done anything to suggest theyve gone rogue. But even if Trump has come to the opposite conclusion, the answer to his question is simple: As Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts reminded Trump, he can simply appeal rulings he believes were wrong.
But no matter how serious the White House is about judicial impeachments, its not up to Trump or his team to execute such a plan: Presidents have literally no formal or procedural role in the process. Rather, that power rests with Congress where a group of far-right Republicans apparently interpreted Trumps appeal as a directive. Axios reported:
Just hours after President Trump called for the impeachment of a federal judge who ruled against his deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans over the weekend, House Republicans introduced a measure to do just that. ... Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said Tuesday he is introducing articles of impeachment against Boasberg, arguing he overstepped his authority, compromised the impartiality of the judiciary, and created a constitutional crisis.
The Texas Republicans impeachment resolution was unveiled with five co-sponsors: Republican Reps. Eli Crane of Arizona, Buddy Carter of Georgia, Mike Collins of Georgia, Barry Moore of Alabama and Andrew Clyde of Georgia......
House GOP leaders, of course, already have their hands full, and they dont seem overly eager to launch impeachment crusades against judges whove done nothing wrong, and whod never be removed by two-thirds of the Senate.
Whats unclear, however, is just how much effort the president intends to invest in this, and what Republican leaders on Capitol Hill will do if Trump decides this is a real priority. Watch this space.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
18 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republican files impeachment against judge who ruled against Trump deportations [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Mar 2025
OP
MaddowBlog-Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes Trump over call for federal judge's impeachment
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2025
#10
A second fuck you to that Texas nitwit Gill he doesn't have a clue as to our Constitution.
Botany
Mar 2025
#17
Republicans waste little time acting on Trump's judicial impeachment demand
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2025
#18