Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Scoop: Top Senate Dems propose emergency Social Security payment boost [View all]spooky3
(38,244 posts)29. Financial advisers have LONG advocated that you need 60% of
Your money in stocks in retirement. This is because most alternatives available to most of us do NOT have returns that keep up with inflation. If you are retired for 20-30 years or more, you could easily run out of money without a substantial part of your portfolio in stocks.
Why do you think that the default target mutual funds in 401ks are a mix of S&P, international stocks, and bond indexes?
Please do the research on this. I see posts like this all over social media, and it just shows me that a lot of people need better financial advisers and/or are endangering their retirements.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Scoop: Top Senate Dems propose emergency Social Security payment boost [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Apr 2025
OP
I think that's a terrible idea. It drives inflation too, and will be unevenly applied.
bucolic_frolic
Apr 2025
#1
Nonsense. Not applicable. Orthogonal to this discussion. Powder dry only on the goose SSI idea. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#22
You were illogical. You tried to put words in my mouth that are nonsense. Logically I am not against paycheck increases
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2025
#25
SS already has COLA. They're not going to pass an adjustment for inflation that hasn't happened yet. (n/t)
thesquanderer
Apr 2025
#6
The GOP will surely force a rule change so they don't have to fucking vote on it, as they've been doing to so
Karasu
Apr 2025
#14
I oppose this unless there is a plan (eg, to raise the contribution rates or cap)
spooky3
Apr 2025
#15
Turning it into a conversation forces trump's bad policies into the spotlight right away.
Torchlight
Apr 2025
#44