Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfz9580m

(16,708 posts)
7. What highplainsdem said
Wed Jan 14, 2026, 08:28 PM
Jan 14

I don’t know about music…I listen to it, but my favorite background is unperturbed wildlife sound with as little anthropogenic nuisance noise (including music) as possible.

Where I live in India, my family has been filing complaints against local temples and other places that blare music for 50 years now.
We don’t like invasive noise pollution. And fight loudspeakers on our street all the time.

So any Ai voice assistants or other such rot illegally and without permission left on as inevitable will now as inevitably result in a backlash.

I was not the best person to induce into these parasitic tech things pushed on people as inevitable. 5% of people actively like that shit and those are people I avoid. Another large percent reacts with : 😳.
I am in the group that will take it to court and make it criminally liable if possible - theft of space, time..New legal precedents. I don’t bother with money. Criminal liability will send a message.

You make a good point. Where is the line? My answer is that after all this, I am for pushing back as much as possible.

I was thinking about my ancestors yesterday..we are from a rare matriarchal community. And my family generally keeps to itself and avoids other people, though not in the Margaret Thatcher sense. It is not atomization so much as finding the minimal amount of social cooperation sans much socializing.

But for all that my family had some modern (i.e. typically associated with Westernization) and non tribal instincts long before they were common, nothing I heard indicated a meekly colonizable or colonized people.

They generally stay out of the papers etc. But the few stories I heard about brushes with would be colonists indicated that it didn’t go that well for the would be colonists. These days it is less about race and nationality sometimes than industry. Lots of oblivious people like I used to be, unaware of the rapacious non-consensual decision-making, mining etc with the constant normalization of the same as if corruption is routine and only irrational people pushback.
That is bullshit.

Now we are all more civilized and so it would be via the courts and criminal liability for the kind of theft highplainsdem talks about. But yeah, I wish these creeps working in ai and data mining and trying these space grabs would get that this won’t end well for them and they need to stay off my street and this part of the grid without destroying normal access to normal infrastructure.

Anyway I will be filing complainte retroactively. That is the sole deterrent.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good for them!!!!! SheltieLover Jan 14 #1
I wish them well. It is fraught. Bluetus Jan 14 #2
Because those tools are trained illegally on stolen intellectual property, any use of them is unethical highplainsdem Jan 14 #3
And btw, what you wrote about AI being used at all levels of the music industry "for a long time" is wrong and highplainsdem Jan 14 #4
By "long time" I mean 5+ years Bluetus Jan 14 #10
I don't believe that AI music taking over is inevitable - that's propaganda from the AI companies. And highplainsdem Jan 15 #11
Just to be clear, my use of the AI material Bluetus Jan 15 #15
You're still likely to end up encouraging some of those people to use AI. highplainsdem Jan 15 #16
No competent lawyer files a brief written by AI Bluetus Jan 15 #17
No ethical person should be using generative AI, period, for anything, unless forced to do so by a highplainsdem Jan 17 #21
What highplainsdem said jfz9580m Jan 14 #7
Now, if only Spotify and the other streaming platforms... LudwigPastorius Jan 14 #5
Very cool. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Jan 14 #6
I absolutely can't stand ai so called music. tazcat Jan 14 #8
I am a happy CAMPER and have been for years. Tikki Jan 14 #9
Jan 22, 2026 Edits jfz9580m Jan 15 #12
Why aren't they all doing this? FakeNoose Jan 15 #13
Spotify makes more money from AI-generated music. It can't be copyrighted, so they don't have to highplainsdem Jan 15 #14
Well I get that FakeNoose Jan 15 #18
Of course it can be copyrighted. Bluetus Jan 17 #19
No. That's not true, and they don't claim copyright. See this: highplainsdem Jan 17 #20
I don't think you understand copyrights. Bluetus Jan 17 #22
You're still 100% wrong, because you ignored this paragraph: highplainsdem Jan 17 #23
What you are citing is only an opinion by the copyright office and that is not binding on anything. Bluetus Jan 17 #24
You can claim a partial copyright if you did any of the work and can prove it. I doubt applying a little highplainsdem Jan 17 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bandcamp has banned all m...»Reply #7