Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,662 posts)
5. More from the article:
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 10:51 AM
Wednesday
The DOE was uniquely positioned to offer a speedy pathway to approval. The nation's commercial nuclear reactors are typically under the regulatory oversight of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Hanson says the NRC is independent and known for its rigor and public process. ... But since the NRC began its work in 1975, the Energy Department has retained the ability to regulate its own reactors, which have historically been used for research and nuclear weapons-related activities.

The rules governing DOE reactors are a mix of federal regulations and directives known as "orders." Changes to federal regulations require public notice and comment, but DOE's orders can be legally changed internally with no public comment period. The orders have historically been made public via a DOE database.

Until now, the DOE's rules have typically applied to just a handful of reactors located on government property. The Reactor Pilot Program expands that regulatory authority to all reactors built as part of the program. Officials explained to the crowd in the June meeting that this includes DOE-contracted reactors built outside of the department's national laboratories.

And while broadening its oversight, officials said, safety personnel located primarily at Idaho National Laboratory would also rewrite the DOE's orders for these reactors.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This maladminstration is worse than Wrongway Feldon UpInArms Wednesday #1
Well that's a disturbing headline kerouac2 Wednesday #2
No way will that hold in court angrychair Wednesday #3
More from the article: mahatmakanejeeves Wednesday #5
Seems obvious, right? yellow dahlia Wednesday #15
I posted about this in GD to highlight that this was done as a favor for the AI bros: highplainsdem Wednesday #4
A nation is not just real estate... GiqueCee Wednesday #6
He gets off on gore and death. yellow dahlia Wednesday #16
Dump: Who cares about nuclear safety anyway? sakabatou Wednesday #7
It would be interesting if people were as concerned with fossil fuel exposures... NNadir Wednesday #8
That's comforting Bayard Wednesday #9
It will be fossil fuels that destroy the natural world as we know it and kill billions of people. hunter Wednesday #10
What about the nuclear plant construction costs and the waste fuel. DougBee Wednesday #11
Welcome to DU ! KS Toronado Wednesday #12
Integrating solar and wind power into a reliable electric grid is expensive. hunter Wednesday #13
Why do I keep reading and hearing KS Toronado Thursday #19
It's an accounting trick. Or a damnable lie. hunter Thursday #21
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #20
A VERY big deal. Expect another lawsuit that the regime will lose. pat_k Wednesday #14
Such a big deal - for many reasons. yellow dahlia Wednesday #18
You say, "Paperwork." I hear, "Profit." Kid Berwyn Wednesday #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Trump administration ...»Reply #5