Latest Breaking News

Fiendish Thingy

(22,588 posts)

41. They aren't talking about eliminating it, but changing the rules

Wed Feb 18, 2026, 11:50 AM

Wednesday

They want to change the rules to require a literal “talking” filibuster, with Dems required to hold the floor to prevent a floor vote.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes, but Democrats could still block it [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Tuesday OP

The GOP has 53 members and (D)s/(I)s have 47 BumRushDaShow Tuesday #1

Fetterman - pro, Murkowski - no BaronChocula Tuesday #8

Am hoping it is DOA in the Senate BumRushDaShow Wednesday #14

Fetterman has not said he supports it. Wiz Imp Wednesday #20

Jesus Christ, when so many Democrats are against this, Fetterman should NOT even bluestarone Wednesday #34

Filibusters can be initiated by a simple email to the clerk stating the intention to filibuster Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2

"This will be the ultimate test of Schumer's leadership." OldBaldy1701E Tuesday #3

What if. after the midterms, the Senate is split 51 D/49R onenote Tuesday #5

Tell me, what legislation is going to be passed with the filibuster intact? Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #7

So you'd hand control over the Senate back to the repubs onenote Wednesday #9

It would be Fetterman handing control to the republicans Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #10

Here is a tracker/scorer for how progressive/conservative our members of Congress are BumRushDaShow Wednesday #16

Fetterman might be a lot of things, but showboater isn't one of them Deminpenn Wednesday #19

"Fetterman might be a lot of things, but showboater isn't one of them" BumRushDaShow Wednesday #30

Fetterman has dressed like that for years Deminpenn Wednesday #40

Oh I know BumRushDaShow Wednesday #42

Casey has said he was not retiring and thus has not ruled out running again. Wiz Imp Wednesday #47

Oh I know like Sherrod Brown BumRushDaShow Wednesday #49

I was very surprised he lost to McCormick, tbh Deminpenn 23 hrs ago #54

Casey and Brown got caught up in a "wave" election BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #55

Seen the video and posted same several times Deminpenn 23 hrs ago #53

Thanks Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #22

Thanks. Wiz Imp Wednesday #24

Agree!!! nm mikewv Wednesday #27

That is because Fetterman made himself into a "media sensation" BumRushDaShow Wednesday #31

I believe for tie-breaking it matters how Fetterman votes, not what party he's a member of? Ilikepurple Wednesday #11

For deciding who is the majority leader, it matters a lot. onenote Wednesday #43

Fetterman would never caucus with Republicans Wiz Imp Wednesday #46

If he was ousted from the Democratic caucus and stripped of committee positions onenote Wednesday #50

If the SAVE Act passed the Senate, it would mean at least 8 Democrats voted for it. Wiz Imp Wednesday #21

Unless, as threatened, they change the rules in the filibuster. Nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #23

If they change the rules eliminating the filibuster, then ZERO Democratic votes are needed to Wiz Imp Wednesday #25

Unless more republicans than Murkowski vote No. nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #26

The title of the Post and the article it refers to is "Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes" Wiz Imp Wednesday #28

You apparently missed this: Wiz Imp Wednesday #29

They aren't talking about eliminating it, but changing the rules Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #41

SO? Let them do it. It will fail and make them look like idiots. Wiz Imp Wednesday #44

best of luck to them Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #48

If it is 51/49, Removing Fetterman by any means does not make Vance a tie breaker karynnj Wednesday #33

"Shapiro would call for a special election. So, he would remain at 50/49 for months. " BumRushDaShow Wednesday #36

Thanks for the correction. karynnj Wednesday #37

No problem - I remember that whole period when Heinz had the plane/helicopter accident BumRushDaShow Wednesday #39

Not talking about removing him from the Senate--talking about removing him from the Democratic caucus onenote Wednesday #51

Oh, you are correct. Pushing him out of the caucus is beyond stupid karynnj Wednesday #52

There is ZERO chance of it passing. Wiz Imp Tuesday #4

I recall election night 2016 . . . AverageOldGuy Tuesday #6

This isn't the same situation Karma13612 Wednesday #12

Ridiculous comparison Wiz Imp Wednesday #18

Lots of good info here, but not a ZERO (all capitals?) chance of passing. Ilikepurple Wednesday #13

Behind-the-scenes no_hypocrisy Wednesday #15

I hope Democratic think tanks are working on ways to help people get legitimate IDs if needed. karynnj Wednesday #35

People who move? College students missing their birth certificate? Hispanics with multiple last names? lostnfound Wednesday #45

I was not saying that it would easy to create a workable process, karynnj 21 hrs ago #57

Republicans...destroying our democracy one pillar at a time. travelingthrulife Wednesday #17

So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax? travelingthrulife Wednesday #32

"So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax?" BumRushDaShow Wednesday #38

Nor would their wives be exempt if this were to pass. ProudMNDemocrat 21 hrs ago #56