Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(1,418 posts)
6. The Andrew "demotion" is NOT about the throne --- it's about the mugshot.
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 02:18 PM
Feb 20

I suspect stripping Andrew of his titles and succession rights has less to do with the (remote) chance of him becoming King and more to do with legal damage control.

The Crown is systematically "de-Royaling" him to prepare for potential criminal proceedings. By turning him into a commoner now, they avoid the unprecedented constitutional crisis of sending a "Prince of the Royal Blood" to prison.

IMHO, this is less about punishing and humiliating him and more about insulating the institution from the blast radius of his eventual downfall. It's a calculated move to make him legally and symbolically "disposable."

They are stripping his titles to ensure that when the "spectacle" reaches its final act, he’s just another commoner in a jumpsuit. The goal is to make sure the Monarchy can say "he’s not one of ours" before the prison doors close. They're scrubbing the Royal DNA off him before he becomes a convict.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought the Andrew formerly known as Prince... cab67 Feb 20 #1
Andrew was effectively stripped of his place in line the instant Charles became King. dickthegrouch Feb 20 #4
Not true and it's happened befroe. Angleae Feb 20 #10
Only because Edward VIII had no children. dickthegrouch Feb 20 #14
He is still 8th in line Wicked Blue Feb 20 #13
on nose. Javaman Feb 20 #2
It would never happen anyway FakeNoose Feb 20 #3
I tend to agree, but I think it may be more symbolic than anything else. hamsterjill Feb 20 #5
Agreed FakeNoose Feb 20 #15
Point Taken. hamsterjill Feb 20 #16
Different man? If that is the deciding factor he would still be immoral!! Real decency does not depend on personal gain Stargazer99 Feb 21 #17
The Andrew "demotion" is NOT about the throne --- it's about the mugshot. QueerDuck Feb 20 #6
Only now? Miguelito Loveless Feb 20 #7
These things must be done delicately... QueerDuck Feb 20 #11
It takes legislation to do it, and consultation with all Commonwealth members that share their Head of State muriel_volestrangler Feb 20 #12
The royals belong in a zoo installation at the British Museum. PufPuf23 Feb 20 #8
BBC this morning said the last Royal to be arrested was Charles I in 1646. Talitha Feb 20 #9
At least the UK, and many other countries, are ahead of the US in recognizing depravity and dealing with it. Aussie105 Feb 21 #18
Meanwhile here in the US it's basically crickets fujiyamasan Sunday #20
Royalty, man, what a scam. NT A-Schwarzenegger Feb 21 #19
The Royals Are Just a Living Tourist Trap, So it Makes Sense DrFunkenstein Sunday #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Government considers remo...»Reply #6