Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(2,664 posts)
32. DISCOVERY
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 08:50 PM
Feb 27

When a person files a defamation suit, the defense is entitled to a discovery process where everyone who has evidence (including Trump in this case, as well as friends of the victim, the FBI agents conducting the interviews, and Bondi who has been obstructing) must submit to a deposition under penalty of perjury.

In my experience (I am not a lawyer but have been through a few depositions) the deposition process is less regimented than the actual trial in court. This is because, even if something is said in deposition, that does not mean it can be used as evidence at trial. So the questions can be broad and far-reaching. There can be objections, but that doesn't usually happen too much. Mainly a lawyer might advise their client not to answer a particular question.

However, it the plaintiff refuses to answer proper questions, the defense can take that back to the court and ask the judge to compel cooperation or dismiss the suit. There is no way Trump would ever go down this path, because he is guilty as hell, and it would quickly become obvious.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A witness statement IS substantiation. Why is it so "outlandlish" to believe pedophiles would do this? SunSeeker Feb 27 #1
If you read Sollenberger's article, it is suggested that this victim is the same one mentioned here AZJonnie Feb 27 #6
What parent let's a 13 year old fly off wnylib Feb 27 #21
Agree, and at the very least, the 'multiple times' makes me really question it AZJonnie Feb 27 #25
If we had all the details from that girl's statements wnylib Feb 27 #31
The UK Guardian has the interviews. When their tone is like it is in this article AZJonnie Feb 28 #33
No need to explain the Guardian's political slant to me. wnylib Feb 28 #34
We do need to see them, on this point we agree AZJonnie Feb 28 #35
More media bullshit ("substantiation") Bluetus Feb 27 #22
We're talking about a guy who's daughter barely escaped his predation Xipe Totec Feb 27 #2
based on the lengths Trump is going to, to distract from these files Skittles Feb 27 #3
Funny, you don't hear him complaining about "Epstein Epstein Epstein" BWdem4life Feb 27 #4
If you read the whole article, the claims unfortunately do sound a bit sketchy AZJonnie Feb 27 #5
the article does paint her as very sketchy, with some criminal activity in recent years LymphocyteLover Feb 27 #10
It's confusing because the Guardian article suggests she dropped the suit AZJonnie Feb 27 #24
Good point. I think there is a lot of conflicitng info on this person, perhaps put out intentionally, perhaps because LymphocyteLover Feb 27 #30
Roll the snuff films Whip-poor-will Feb 27 #7
Welcome to DU ! KS Toronado Feb 27 #13
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Feb 27 #28
Even the "appearence of an impropriety" is bad enough. Hieronymus Phact Feb 27 #8
there were 4 minors who accused the orange pedo. Javaman Feb 27 #9
and The Guardian is saying they've seen these 3 transcripts or notes and they are not as damning as we might like LymphocyteLover Feb 27 #11
I wonder if this was the young woman who settled a claim with the Epstein estate. As I recall, there Vinca Feb 27 #12
Have the DOJ or the Republicans who control congress even tried to contact this person everyonematters Feb 27 #14
"Unsubstantiated claims"? Has The Guardian Never Heard Of "Circumstantial ColoringFool Feb 27 #15
Odd how the victim's name was published. Kid Berwyn Feb 27 #16
So the White House's fall back position is going to be this is really just unsubstantiated allegations? Botany Feb 27 #17
It's a crime to file a false FBI report. Six117 Feb 27 #18
So she had a small criminal history so the victim deniers are out in force. travelingthrulife Feb 27 #19
If there is ONE there is a bluestarone Feb 27 #20
interview the survivors azureblue Feb 27 #23
Don't want to beat up . . . Scubamatt Feb 27 #26
I'd like to ask people who consider the claims BlueKota Feb 27 #27
Notice he hasn't sued anyone who has made these claims yet. ificandream Feb 27 #29
DISCOVERY Bluetus Feb 27 #32
Kick ck4829 Mar 2 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Epstein files contain exp...»Reply #32