Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,792 posts)
3. All of his grant revocations should be illegal.
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 01:15 PM
Sunday

Even if a grant isn't exactly a binding contract, I believe there's a doctrine called "promissory estoppel that says, if you knowlingly make a promise or representation to someone, and they act in reliance on it, and the breach of your promise or representation would cause harm to them, then they have a right to force you to honor your representation or promise or sue for damages or something.

I understand the need for governmental immunity in many situations, but imho, willful, wrongful actions by individuals in government should not be deemed to be "within the scope of their employment" and shielded by immunity; rather, the individuals should be held personally liable for the damage caused.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Underground Railroad muse...»Reply #3