Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)

13. Those states mentioned all have some "in-person" too

Reply to Unwind Your Mind (Reply #11)

Thu May 28, 2026, 11:49 AM

Thursday

The link I included in my post lists all the caveats and options for each of those states. They are a polar opposite of states with no (non-absentee voting).

(ETA see update above - I meant to edit this one with the additional info but landed there instead )

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unwind Your Mind

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge refuses to block Trump order to create federal voter list and limit mail voting [View all] BumRushDaShow Thursday OP

If states control their own elections, how is this possible? Chasstev365 Thursday #1

The legalese... GiqueCee Thursday #2

I hope that USPS would say 'no' and refuse to have any part of it. n/t CousinIT Thursday #3

The EO is unenforceable Fiendish Thingy Thursday #4

One of the problems is the directive to the USPS to intervene and intercept mail ballots BumRushDaShow Thursday #5

I get around that by hand delivering my Dr. T Thursday #7

There are a 8 states where ALL voting is by mail BumRushDaShow Thursday #9

No that's not right about California Unwind Your Mind Thursday #11

Those states mentioned all have some "in-person" too BumRushDaShow Thursday #13

what if PO turns on us? BettyBlueDot Thursday #10

In Wisconsin, we've got a website that allows us to Dr. T Thursday #12

Appeal immediately liberalgunwilltravel Thursday #6

So this "judge" thinks it's ok for one man to alter how we vote in a way that benefits that individual. groundloop Thursday #8

This judge is auditioning for consideration to the Supreme Court Deuxcents Thursday #14

"Nominated by Donald Trump and confirmed by the Senate in 2019" Polybius Thursday #15

So depressing. I sure hope no Dems voted to confirm this MAGAT judge LymphocyteLover Thursday #16