Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(55,707 posts)
18. Hypocrisy is a bit obvious
Wed Jun 24, 2026, 01:12 PM
Jun 24


Shootings, Arrest, Trial and More: The Kyle Rittenhouse Story Explained

BREAKING: A jury has found Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty on all counts in his murder trial connected to the shootings of three people during unrest in Kenosha during the summer of 2020. Details here.

_________________________________________________________________________

On the night of Aug. 25, 2020, Kyle Rittenhouse went from being described as a 17-year-old police enthusiast to a teenage gunman accused of shooting three people, two of them fatally.

His story became the center of bitter nationwide divisions on issues of guns, protests and policing. Soon, his fate will be in the hands of a jury.

So what exactly happened? Here's a look back at how the case began and where it has gone since.

An Overview of What Happened

Rittenhouse, 17 at the time, traveled the few miles from his home across the state border to Kenosha on Aug. 25, 2020, as the city was in the throes of damaging protests that followed a white police officer's shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man, after a call to a domestic disturbance.

Bystander video captured the critical minutes when Rittenhouse, with a Smith and Wesson AR-style semiautomatic rifle, shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, 28.


It’s okay if you bring a gun to a protest and kill people, so long as you are a hate filled reichwinger

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The indifference by most Americans tells me a lot about what kind of country we have become. ☮ walkingman Jun 24 #1
The way the system is rigged, nothing can change until at least November or even January. PSPS Jun 24 #6
I often say: popsdenver Jun 24 #14
Maybe it's not indifference. Trueblue Texan Jun 24 #29
I hope MAGA realizes these same laws can be used against them if a Dem ever sees the Whitehouse again. n/t SpankMe Jun 24 #2
Little comfort relogic Jun 24 #10
Well said, Lc popsdenver Jun 24 #15
That ship has sailed SpankMe Jun 24 #21
Can be? It damn well better be WILL BE, starting at 12:05p on January 20, 2029. Seeking Serenity Jun 24 #17
I'll do everything I can to help it happen SpankMe Jun 24 #28
At the rate the (conservative) courts Quanto Magnus Jun 24 #22
I would imagine that the appeals are already being written and submitted, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 24 #3
The sentence length is the key here (consecutive vs concurrent) and if there were problems at trial. LeftInTX Jun 24 #11
It's the Fifth Circuit, Jake dpibel Jun 24 #12
Kicking with DISGUST! Faux pas Jun 24 #4
It's hard to believe this made it all the way to sentencing SpankMe Jun 24 #5
suspect that the rather big problem here (and probably including in eyes of the jury) stopdiggin Jun 24 #7
We know there was at least one assault weapon MichMan Jun 24 #8
If any other weapons had been found... Shipwack Jun 24 #13
Also remember that sentenced the husband of one of the protestors who was not walkingman Jun 24 #20
Which of course raises many issues about who gets prosecuted for what when guns are involved... TygrBright Jun 24 #16
Hypocrisy is a bit obvious UpInArms Jun 24 #18
No. It really isn't. And we do not answer this charge by aping the the behavior of mentally deficient stopdiggin Jun 24 #23
I believe you misunderstood my post UpInArms Jun 24 #24
while mine was directed toward the brain dead idiocy involved stopdiggin Jun 24 #25
I do agree UpInArms Jun 24 #26
Well, after hearing the evidence, a jury convicted them, and a jury acquitted Rittenhouse. MichMan Jun 24 #27
I know this is an oldie - but it's true. harumph Jun 25 #31
The right wing so desperately wants this case Torchlight Jun 24 #9
Almost lost it over this topic yesterday. People don't recognize what is happening before our eyes lostnfound Jun 24 #19
Material support is a pretty broad charge and probably unconstitutional questionseverything Jun 24 #30
Unless "material support" is well defined, it's just a garbage can term harumph Jun 25 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'This is injustice': how ...»Reply #18