Opinion: Trump initiatives might be foiled by the right's defeat of Chevron

[sop]

2. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo: Decision summary

https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-decision-summary

"Time will tell what the impact of Loper Bright will be on public health. On the one hand, it will impact the work of federal agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, likely making it more difficult for such agencies to pass important regulations that protect public health. On the other hand, much of the U.S. public health infrastructure is run at the state or local level, and Loper Bright directly affects only the operations of federal agencies."

"Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024) involved the National Marine Fisheries Service’s interpretation of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation Management Act, which requires certain fishing boats to carry a federal monitor on board to enforce the agency’s regulations. The agency specifically interpreted the statute to require that fishing boats cover the costs of this monitor."

https://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/litigation-tracker/loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo-2024

"Chevron offered a permission slip. For both Republican and Democratic presidents, the Chevron doctrine was a protective shield."

The Loper Bright decision reined in the Biden administration's efforts to protect wildlife. I wonder how the court would have interpreted the Chevron doctrine under a Republican president?