Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

lees1975

(6,526 posts)
Mon Apr 28, 2025, 11:04 AM Apr 28

I'm with David Hogg's claim that the Democratic Party needs a leadership reset. [View all]

https://signalpress.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-democratic-party-needs-reset.html

From the start of Biden's term in office, I was not pleased with the direction the party was going and with the things its elected leaders, especially in Congress were doing. I'm a Democrat who earns the right to speak up. I knock on doors for candidates and I contribute. I'm not silent when I need to speak up. I send communication to both Senators, my representative, and my state legislators.

Off the reaction to the January 6th insurrection, we got an impeachment with a dead end conviction that we knew would be the outcome in the senate. But we also got a Congressional investigation that produced a mountain of evidence, more than enough for a guilty verdict to many different crimes, including leading an insurrection against the government of the United States. That should have been followed up by some bold steps requiring some risk to be taken, but necessary for justice to be served.

And the justice department of the United States of America, in the hands of the Democratic party and the administration of President Joe Biden, failed to take the bold, risky steps necessary, dragged their feet, and let the opportunity to prevent Trump from ever taking office again, and most likely spending prison time justifiably, pass without taking advantage of the use of the power that they had.


People want things to get done, quickly. They don't want to drag things along until the right person has the chance to approve some idea or plan. Democrats turned off a lot of potential constituents by the panic and confusion that happened when the party couldn't get a handle on who was running the show, in the weeks leading up to Harris' nomination. The fact that the big shots and major donors had to put their stamp of approval on everything was a huge turnoff that drove a lot of voters away.

I think Hogg is on the right track here. He wants to cut through all of that partisan political goo, and get right to the point of finding leaders who will get things done and ignore the old line, old school protocol. He wants to find and empower leaders who will take risks and who will be bold enough to get things done without worrying about setting themselves up for future political success. He's looking for people who will represent the people, not the money interests or the influence peddlers. So he doesn't want to play the games, and that's brought out the critics whose power is vested in old school thinking, and threatened by something more popular than they are.


I've heard his critics say he should focus on helping Democrats beat Republicans, not on primarying Democrats. But I think this route is the way to victory for Democrats. We need to win Congressional seats and our playing by the old rules isn't cutting it. The establishment has played itself out, and it is clearly not leading any resistance to Trump, that's being done by a whole different constituency. We are facing a constitutional crisis because Democrats weren't bold enough to take the political risks necessary to have Trump sent to prison where he belongs, instead of being re-elected to the White House, where he doesn't belong.

Let's give new leadership a shot at it. Thanks, David. Speak the truth to power.
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I agreed with david when i heard his strategy. Karadeniz Apr 28 #1
Replacing one Democrat with another Democrat does NOTHING to help us to become a MAJORITY PARTY. Oopsie Daisy Apr 28 #16
No, but some of those Democrats that need to be replaced are risks to lose their seats to the GOP. So why not replace lees1975 Apr 28 #21
Really? Which ones? Why would a Democrat in a "solid blue/safe-blue" district be at risk of losing to a Republican? Oopsie Daisy Apr 28 #36
Depends on which Democrats you replace 0rganism Apr 28 #23
Is this a Hollywood script? nt DURHAM D Apr 28 #2
A Hollywood script? lees1975 Apr 28 #3
just to b clear- he is NOT using dnc money. mopinko Apr 28 #4
Just to be clear DownriverDem Apr 28 #8
imperfect allies r not enemies mopinko Apr 28 #12
Why? That's no requirement. There are plenty of party establishment people who have their fingers in more than one pie lees1975 Apr 28 #22
I don't know if he is or isn't MichMan Apr 28 #35
i've heard him say it several times. mopinko Apr 28 #39
If these reports are accurate, I'm not planning on donating anything to it. MichMan Apr 28 #41
big deal. mopinko Apr 28 #42
here's that vid mopinko Apr 28 #43
Lots of Dems raising money but doing little to stop Trump. lees1975 Apr 28 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author mopinko Apr 28 #5
Sure wryter2000 Apr 28 #6
likely nothing. mopinko Apr 28 #15
Let's see... Shipwack Apr 28 #19
Nothing that hasn't already gone wrong. lees1975 Apr 28 #24
Nope DownriverDem Apr 28 #7
Seems like the party, with a 29% approval rating going down, is destroying itself. lees1975 Apr 28 #25
Wasn't sure at first, but David Hogg's ideas make sense Wild blueberry Apr 28 #9
I agree with David Greyhead Apr 28 #10
I agree with him to a point dflprincess Apr 28 #11
Ugh. He's a hot mess. I knew this wouldn't end well. Oopsie Daisy Apr 28 #13
Well, David, send a strongly worded letter... rubbersole Apr 28 #14
Agree with David and I am 83 kiranon Apr 28 #17
didn't he support m. frost? et tu Apr 28 #18
Biden should have put in an interim poli-junkie Apr 28 #20
His e-mails have gone to my junk file Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 28 #26
"How does one be effective in the minority?" mike_c Apr 28 #28
What legislation has Bernie and AOC passed being in the minority? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 28 #30
If Bernie had been senate majority leader in 2021... lees1975 Apr 28 #31
Are you aware that judicial nominations are not subject to filibuster? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 28 #34
Yes, but we would have needed to break the filibuster in order to amend the judiciary act to create the additional seats lees1975 Apr 28 #37
If Sanders had abolished the filibuster back in 2021, there wouldn't have even been a cloture vote on the Trump budget. MichMan Apr 28 #38
There wouldn't have been a Trump budget. lees1975 Apr 28 #48
True, along with removing Fox News from cable, declaring the GOP a terrorist organization & repealing the 2nd Amendment MichMan Apr 29 #49
I fucking detest the showboating Skittles Apr 29 #50
We had the majority and the White House between the 2020 and 2022 elections and on this front, accomplished zero. lees1975 Apr 28 #29
100% agree mike_c Apr 28 #27
SOMETHING NEEDS TO CHANGE Skittles Apr 28 #32
Or many other countries for that matter. AloeVera Apr 29 #54
I agree in principle EthanBlue Apr 28 #33
the house is not SUPPOSED to b a lifetime thing. mopinko Apr 28 #40
Who needs David Hogg when we have the Justice Democrats primarying good Democrats? LetMyPeopleVote Apr 28 #44
I loathe them and their treachery. Oopsie Daisy Apr 28 #45
They have little influence or traction. A splinter group. lees1975 Apr 28 #46
Getting one, with Governors, Pritzker and Walz elleng Apr 29 #51
I am with David too, Fuck the old... bottomofthehill Apr 29 #52
no one is saying they had no accomplishments Skittles Apr 29 #53
It has nothing to do with their age. lees1975 Apr 29 #56
I'm all in. Phoenix61 Apr 29 #55
K & R lees1975 Apr 30 #57
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»I'm with David Hogg's cla...