Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,112 posts)
4. + about a million.
Mon Jan 25, 2021, 04:23 AM
Jan 2021

Yet, these so-called pro-lifers are A-OK with murder of already born human beings with family members and friends who love and depend upon them in their lives.

Still, it's widely acceptable to kill people in wars for oil, cops shooting people over toy guns, or deaths caused by contaminants, polluted environments, unsafe working conditions, etc. Not to mention disease and lack.of healthcare.

And those deaths are accepted, because certain people, traditionally powerful & wealthy men, benefit from the conditions causing those deaths

But a woman has no right to make such decisions that directly affect her life and have far less impact on others. (The unwanted unborn don't have loads of people whose lives they're a major part of loving them, depending on them, etc.)

Blatant hypocrisy and misogyny in action.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Hampshire»Republicans sponsor two b...»Reply #4