Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

New Jersey

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(71,889 posts)
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 10:39 AM 23 hrs ago

N.J. man says he was almost kicked off plane after flight attendant found shirt offensive [View all]

Local News
N.J. man says he was almost kicked off plane after flight attendant found shirt offensive

By Andrew Ramos
July 12, 2026 / 11:30 PM EDT / CBS New York

A New Jersey man says his t-shirt nearly got him kicked off a United Airlines flight. ... Sam Saadeh, of Linden, was on a flight traveling from Atlanta to Newark Liberty International Airport on June 4 while wearing a t-shirt that said, "Bombing kids is not self defense." ... Saadeh, who is of Palestinian descent, said the t-shirt holds a deeper meaning and advocates for children. ... According to a recent United Nations report, more than 20,000 children have been killed in Gaza by Israel in what have been described as targeted attacks. The Israeli government has rejected the report and has denied deliberately targeting civilians.

"Change your shirt or you can't get on this flight"

Saadeh told CBS News New York he was "very confused" when a supervisor pulled him off the plane just after boarding. ... "He was like, 'Hey, the flight attendant finds your shirt offensive,' and I was like, 'Why?'" Saadeh said. "He goes, 'Here are the choices. Either you change your shirt or you can't get on this flight.'"


A New Jersey man was on a flight traveling from Atlanta to Newark on June 4, 2026, while wearing a t-shirt that said, "Bombing kids is not self defense."
CBS News New York

Both upset and humiliated, Saadeh says he opted to change, but claims he couldn't get specific answers, even when he landed in Newark, where he spoke to airline personnel. ... "She kept saying, like, 'You could see how the shirt is offensive.' I was like, 'I can't see how the shirt is offensive,'" Saadeh said. "She was like, 'It's 2026.' I was like, 'I know what year it is.'" ... He added, " 'Do you think kids shouldn't be bombed, or kids should be bombed? Like, what are you offended by?'"

Flier files complaint with DOT

A United spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News New York, "This customer flew as scheduled after changing his shirt." ... As per the airline's rules posted on its website, United has the right to deny transport to passengers who are "not properly clothed, or whose clothing is lewd, obscene or offensive." ... Saadeh said he is consulting with lawyers.

{snip}
94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did his darker skin (visible in picture) RockCreek 23 hrs ago #1
Hmmmm - let's guess. 3catwoman3 22 hrs ago #3
Or three guesses, first two don't count....🤔 littlemissmartypants 22 hrs ago #6
Hmmm.... OldBaldy1701E 56 min ago #92
I'm not offended. badhair77 22 hrs ago #2
"How dare you prick my conscience... AloeVera 22 hrs ago #4
Who supported bombing kids? yardwork 22 hrs ago #12
The person "offended". AloeVera 22 hrs ago #18
???? yardwork 22 hrs ago #19
You are somehow conflating two very distinct policies. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #30
There must be a more detailed article that is being referenced here. yardwork 21 hrs ago #31
Since you believe a policy against offensive attire and one on endangering public safety are one and the same... AloeVera 21 hrs ago #45
I appreciate your research into this. yardwork 21 hrs ago #46
I appreciate your research into this. yardwork 21 hrs ago #47
Lack of research is not the problem here. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #51
It's not a question of enforcing a long-standing policy SpankMe 21 hrs ago #39
We all know what the shirt refers to TBF 20 hrs ago #68
Airlines treat flying as a privilege, not a right. yardwork 19 hrs ago #69
lol - yes all of that is factual TBF 18 hrs ago #70
I'm certainly not defending it. yardwork 18 hrs ago #71
Wearing a shirt is not defacing property - TBF 18 hrs ago #73
We all must kowtow to our corporate masters Farmer-Rick 50 min ago #93
If you want to fly on a commercial airline, yes. yardwork 21 min ago #94
What the heck United? One of your flight attendants found that offensive? Biophilic 22 hrs ago #5
Welcome to the United States of Authoritarianism. littlemissmartypants 22 hrs ago #8
Here's what I would have told the personnel he spoke with BaronChocula 20 hrs ago #64
Any reference to bombing or bombs gets anyone kicked off planes, yardwork 22 hrs ago #7
My thought exactly. And good morning. NT mahatmakanejeeves 22 hrs ago #9
Good morning! yardwork 22 hrs ago #10
Maybe she should have explained that policy whathehell 22 hrs ago #16
Sounds like she did. yardwork 22 hrs ago #17
As the passenger said, whathehell 21 hrs ago #41
According to the article, that's exactly what happened. yardwork 21 hrs ago #42
"joked about a bomb" ... VERY DAMNED DIFFERENT. Again CONTEXT matters. hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #50
I read your report of the article whathehell 21 hrs ago #52
You might be responding to the wrong post? yardwork 21 hrs ago #54
You are correct whathehell 21 hrs ago #58
No worries at all. yardwork 21 hrs ago #61
Good.. whathehell 20 hrs ago #66
You are correct whathehell 21 hrs ago #59
Again context matters for use of the word "bomb" hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #49
Exactly.. whathehell 21 hrs ago #56
Nice stretch there. AloeVera 22 hrs ago #20
Context matters, yardwork. That is an incredible stretch. I like his lawyer's odds on this one. hlthe2b 22 hrs ago #24
Really. yardwork 21 hrs ago #27
Uggh huh. Threatening to remove him if he did not remove his shirt is a viable "harm" especially hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #36
yeah- R0ckyRac00n 21 hrs ago #55
Thanks for confirming what I suspected. ShazzieB 20 hrs ago #67
The First Amendment is not relevant Cirsium 14 hrs ago #83
THANK YOU Skittles 15 hrs ago #81
It will be settled out of court. The Wizard 22 hrs ago #11
Did he miss the flight? yardwork 22 hrs ago #15
So their policy is if anyone of their staff is offended by your shirt, intheflow 21 hrs ago #34
You don't say the word "BOMB" in an airport or on a jet... nor should you make references to them. QueerDuck 22 hrs ago #13
His subsequent actions tend to support that conclusion. yardwork 22 hrs ago #14
Really...? displacedvermoter 22 hrs ago #23
You. Don't. Say. BOMB. In. An. Airport. 💣️✈️ QueerDuck 22 hrs ago #26
Ok displacedvermoter 21 hrs ago #29
He didn't say it. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #38
Blaming the flight attendant personally ignores the reality of the airline industry and how corporate liability works. QueerDuck 18 hrs ago #72
The airline itself characterized it as a dress code violation, not a safety violation. AloeVera 17 hrs ago #74
Passengers must obey flight crew instructions. He did. Then whined about it. End of story. QueerDuck 17 hrs ago #75
So, using your own words, someone made a "subjective judgement" AloeVera 16 hrs ago #78
As a legitimate backup to the threatening word of bomb. Yes. When it comes to flight crew the rule is simple.... QueerDuck 15 hrs ago #79
I want that shirt to wear to protests, Bayard 22 hrs ago #21
This is the ridiculous side of those who want to make everything antisemitic and there are those hlthe2b 22 hrs ago #22
Who said this incident is antisemitic? yardwork 21 hrs ago #28
I listed this as but one of several possibilities. Again, jumping to conclusions is problematic hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #32
What similar incidents? yardwork 21 hrs ago #35
If she found that offensive then she must find 'Bombing kids is self defense' acceptable ToxMarz 22 hrs ago #25
Exactly! If his flight partner had a t-shirt with your slogan, which one would get kicked off? TheRickles 16 hrs ago #77
A thought experiment relogic 21 hrs ago #33
I find that to be extraordinarily unlikely. yardwork 21 hrs ago #37
Please be specific relogic 21 hrs ago #40
Your last sentence. yardwork 21 hrs ago #43
So, then relogic 21 hrs ago #53
Sure, the Trump administration is nuts and authoritarian. yardwork 21 hrs ago #60
You underestimate relogic 13 hrs ago #85
or maybe Skittles 13 hrs ago #84
Hell, I want one! no_hypocrisy 21 hrs ago #44
Just don't try to wear it on a plane! yardwork 21 hrs ago #48
In related news Soul_of_Wit 21 hrs ago #57
He'll win Joinfortmill 21 hrs ago #62
He didn't mention any names. Why would one be upset?. twodogsbarking 20 hrs ago #63
Me feelwings were hurt. I've seen shirts on planes WAY more "Hot Words" chouchou 20 hrs ago #65
Irony... Both sides of the conflict could use the same meme/slogan on their propaganda. OC375 16 hrs ago #76
Would an idiot donning mAga attire get treated the same? BHDem53 15 hrs ago #80
Not likely... displacedvermoter 14 hrs ago #82
In solidarity.... Dethhogan 13 hrs ago #86
Selective reading by a not too bright airline person. Aussie105 12 hrs ago #87
I'm offended by that United flight attendant RainCaster 11 hrs ago #88
Will United make the MAGAt change their shirt? Or take off their red hat? maspaha 11 hrs ago #89
Gonna go out on a limb here and say air travel is not the place to fly your position flags high LearnedHand 10 hrs ago #90
I'm giving the flight attendant a mulligan on this Ruby the Liberal 1 hr ago #91
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»N.J. man says he was almo...»Reply #0