Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Think. Again.

(20,726 posts)
4. Good point...
Wed Jan 1, 2025, 04:38 AM
Jan 1

...there should be clear language forbidding any access, clearly spelling out that authorization of access does not exist, and any third party access will be heavily prosecuted and result in the mandated immediate destruction of the accessed machines.

Edit to add: It should also be made clear that these rules only apply to machines that incorporate non-open source programming, and that third party access to any machines using read-only open-source programming must always remain accessible to any third party at any time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Step in the correct direction Attilatheblond Dec 31 #1
YES! this is definitively a positive development... Think. Again. Dec 31 #2
Another caveat involves authorization dickthegrouch Dec 31 #3
Good point... Think. Again. Jan 1 #4
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Court ruling on 3rd party...»Reply #4