Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latin America

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Judi Lynn

(162,711 posts)
Wed Nov 22, 2023, 08:05 AM Nov 2023

Machu Picchu: A Radiocarbon Dating Study Reveals the Site is Older Than We Thought [View all]

Story by Jade h •
10h

Machu Picchu, the ancient Inca citadel perched on a mountain ridge in Peru, is one of the most stunning and mysterious archaeological sites in the world. For decades, historians have relied on Spanish colonial documents to date the construction and occupation of this marvel of engineering and architecture. However, a new study has challenged the conventional wisdom and suggested that Machu Picchu may be older than previously believed.



The study, published in the journal Antiquity, used radiocarbon dating technology to analyze human remains found in a cemetery at Machu Picchu. The researchers used a technique called accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) to measure the amount of carbon-14 in the bones, which decays at a known rate over time. By comparing the carbon-14 levels in the samples with those of known age, the researchers were able to estimate when the people lived and died.

The results showed that Machu Picchu was in use from about A.D. 1420 to A.D. 1530, making it at least 20 years older than the accepted historical record suggests. According to the documents written by Spanish conquistadors, Machu Picchu was built after 1440 by the Inca emperor Pachacuti, who expanded the Inca empire to its greatest extent. However, the radiocarbon dating evidence indicates that the site may have been built by his predecessor, Viracocha, or even earlier.

This finding has important implications for our understanding of Inca history and culture. It suggests that Machu Picchu was not a mere retreat for the Inca elite, but a strategic and ceremonial center that played a key role in the consolidation and expansion of the Inca state. It also challenges the reliability of using colonial documents as the sole source of information for dating ancient ruins in the Americas. The study argues that “perhaps the time has come for the radiocarbon evidence to assume priority in reconstructions of the chronology of the Inca emperors and the dating of Inca monumental sites such as Machu Picchu.”

Machu Picchu is a remarkable example of the architectural and engineering skills of the Inca civilization. The site consists of about 200 structures, including temples, palaces, terraces, and fountains, built on a steep mountain ridge about 2,420 meters above sea level. The Inca used simple tools and local materials to carve and fit the stones, some weighing more than 50 tons, without using mortar or wheels. They also developed sophisticated systems of water management and agriculture to sustain the site.

More:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/tripideas/machu-picchu-a-radiocarbon-dating-study-reveals-the-site-is-older-than-we-thought/ar-AA1kgmcA

(Isn't it nightmarish realizing the world has relied upon the writings of the people who massacred, plundered, destroyed the Inca culture to describe the reality of the world they destroyed, revealed to them through the language of their victims they didn't actually understand, for authentic understanding of the ancient civilization, clearly advanced, they vaporized? Never even concsidered questioning it?)



After all, why would they lie about the people they murdered, after stealing their country and destroying their lives?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Machu Picchu: A Radiocarb...»Reply #0