Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John Kerry

Showing Original Post only (View all)

beachmom

(15,239 posts)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 09:12 AM Dec 2012

New York Times article today [View all]

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/us/politics/obama-expected-to-name-kerry-as-secretary-of-state.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — President Obama is leaning strongly toward naming John Kerry, the Massachusetts senator and unsuccessful Democratic nominee for president eight years ago, to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state, according to administration officials and friends of Mr. Kerry.

But the announcement will be delayed, at least until later this week and maybe beyond, because of the Connecticut school shooting and what one official called “some discomfort” with the idea of Mr. Obama’s announcing a national security team in which the top posts are almost exclusively held by white men.


The article is fairly annoying with a few instances pointing out Kerry's strengths. Here's an example of the insult plus back handed compliment technique:

Mr. Kerry has worked hard to deepen his relationship with Mr. Obama. The president has at times considered him long-winded and a throwback to a previous generation of diplomats, aides said. But Mr. Kerry impressed Mr. Obama and Mr. Donilon when he was sent to deal with Hamid Karzai, the famously unpredictable president of Afghanistan, after Mr. Karzai’s supporters rigged a presidential election in 2009 and refused a second round of voting.

Mr. Kerry also visited Pakistan several times to try to ease recurrent tensions, including a two-week visit after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. Pakistani officials tried to get Mr. Kerry to write what they called a “blood oath” that the United States would never take action to seize Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. Mr. Kerry found a diplomatic way out, saying the United States had no “designs” on Pakistan’s weapons.

“It meant nothing,” a member of Mr. Obama’s national security team said later. “And it solved the crisis. Quite artfully.”


I mean that's great that he is probably getting the post but compare this to all the praise the Hillary appointment got, when Kerry actually has a good track record of doing good diplomatic work.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times article today [View all] beachmom Dec 2012 OP
Pure silliness. ProSense Dec 2012 #1
Exactly! DoBotherMe Dec 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Dec 2012 #5
Explain what? Mass Dec 2012 #6
delete. not important n/t politicasista Dec 2012 #7
Explain what? karynnj Dec 2012 #8
Your observation makes a lot of sense Blaukraut Dec 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Jan 2013 #14
link deleted n/t politicasista Dec 2012 #10
That is infuriating, but typical NYT karynnj Dec 2012 #2
I have given up on the media in general Mass Dec 2012 #3
I thought this article was drivel MBS Dec 2012 #11
Great!! Wonderful insight karynnj Dec 2012 #13
No surprises here. wisteria Dec 2012 #12
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»New York Times article to...»Reply #0