Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ObamaKerryDem

(1,466 posts)
23. But he will be, in two years..
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:44 AM
Feb 2012

If he doesn't become SOS first But in order for him to even have that option, this President must be reelected-allowing the Repubs the upper hand in press exposure and talking points about these "Culture Wars" doesn't help that..(Not aiming that at JK alone or even him specifically perse but Dems in general are letting them win the message battle on this with this public friction-undermines the provision as it stands currently imo. Big mistake I think).

Though I believe this will ultimately benefit the POTUS in the long run-and that he will win re election by a more sizable margin than many pundits believe. But they need to be careful not to compromise to the point of self defeat here.

JK needs to be mindful here too,especially if he does run as planned in two years . Women, progressive and yes, Choice inclined women comprise a huge part of his base. As I understand it his victory over Weld in 96 was largely due to his huge win and advantage with women voters. Mass is not necessarily of the same mind on these things as Bob Casey's PA. Not that I think JK has sold out on this-his statement was actually quite nuanced. But I am interested in hearing his-and VP Biden's definition of "compromise" on and for this.

I actually don't think JK meant to directly oppose the POTUS on this but the perception unfortunately is there-I'd love to hear him go into a more indepth explanation of that aspect of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

All employees to be covered Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #1
Quote ProSense Feb 2012 #2
Yup. I edited my post to include more arguments. beachmom Feb 2012 #3
Related: ProSense Feb 2012 #5
Oh, and THEY will never be happy beachmom Feb 2012 #4
Exactly. n/t wisteria Feb 2012 #19
Hey John, marsis Feb 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Feb 2012 #9
Why go to anti - Catholic rhetoric on a completely unrelated issue karynnj Feb 2012 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Feb 2012 #13
They ARE fighting the provision for everyone. beachmom Feb 2012 #15
I think they are going far too far here karynnj Feb 2012 #17
How Many Of The Dems That Came Out Against This Are Running For Re-election...... global1 Feb 2012 #7
John Kerry is not up for re-election beachmom Feb 2012 #8
What would you want him to say - given that the Obama administartion is working on a karynnj Feb 2012 #12
But he will be, in two years.. ObamaKerryDem Feb 2012 #23
Kerry absolutely did NOT come out against this karynnj Feb 2012 #18
Kerry is BACKING the current adminstration position here karynnj Feb 2012 #10
Well, let's wait and see what they say. beachmom Feb 2012 #14
There are things I disagree with Kerry on, but on thsi, it really seems that you are karynnj Feb 2012 #20
There are also medical reasons to take birth control pills. beachmom Feb 2012 #25
Also, if a pharmacist has a religious conscience objection beachmom Feb 2012 #27
Could not agree with you more,beachmom! ObamaKerryDem Feb 2012 #28
Maybe I'm not being eloquent here but this sure is: beachmom Feb 2012 #16
I think he is wrong on this. And sad he would take this. Mass Feb 2012 #21
Just heard this on the Ed Show on MSNBC tonight.. ObamaKerryDem Feb 2012 #22
Here is a post by Kevin Drum that explains what this is about. Mass Feb 2012 #24
Well said, Mass. beachmom Feb 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»TPM: Kerry Becomes Lates...»Reply #23