Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,077 posts)
5. Because they had new facts and because HRC has made claims that do not match
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:36 PM
May 2016

I think they are wrong, but it is true that it is an article on something that reached fruition 10 months ago, they are technically right. I realized it fits good reads better, but who even bothers to look there - so I knew when putting it up, that I was doing it because LBN is the slowest moving most serious big forum. (I did cut and paste it and put it in GD, where it sunk pretty quickly. )

It did get 620 views - and is substantial enough that people might remember the next time HRC claims Kerry "finalized the deal" - as if he waltzed in and signed the result of her work.

To me the most damning paragraphs were those contrasting that Obama was very open to creating a bridge - HRC saw negotiations as more a way to expose that Tehren would rebuff us. (sounds like her "hunting down" the Chinese - I would love to know how that debate line played in that proud country with its long history and culture)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Kerry buys chocolate in G...»Reply #5