Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(11,906 posts)
10. I've never heard of a 401k where one is forced to buy stocks and stock funds. They all offer fixed income choices as
Mon Apr 7, 2025, 06:25 PM
Apr 7

well, such as bond funds, at least nobody has claimed their 401k is an exception.

So yes, he should contribute to take advantage of the employer match at least. Whether it should be in a stock (equity) or fixed income fund is a separate choice.

It drives me binky-bonky, quite frankly, when people slam 401k's as being synonymous with the stock market. And then go on and on about how stocks have periodically crashed. I would sue any employer whose 401k offered me no fixed income alternatives.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Personal Finance and Investing»Should my husband still k...»Reply #10