Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Frugal and Energy Efficient Living

(18,910 posts)

14. yes, radiant heat vs. raising the temperature of the air

Tue Dec 10, 2013, 08:49 AM

Dec 2013

<---- (not a physics person)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hmmmmmm dixiegrrrrl Nov 2013 #1

Your challenge is . . . mzteris Nov 2013 #4

This is very interesting! onestepforward Nov 2013 #2

Here's the same idea, Ednahilda Nov 2013 #3

That is simpler and I might give it a try. Kaleva Nov 2013 #5

I am going to try it also. RebelOne Dec 2013 #10

This is simpler, but if I were going to use this one Curmudgeoness Nov 2013 #7

Another way to make a flower pot candle heater using bricks Kaleva Nov 2013 #6

A GlowWarm electric candle may be a better choice. Kaleva Nov 2013 #8

One could do the same thing with light bulbs ConcernedCanuk Nov 2013 #9

Interesting. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #11

An average sitting human puts out 70 watts Progressive dog Dec 2013 #12

The physics guy in me.. sendero Dec 2013 #13

yes, radiant heat vs. raising the temperature of the air eShirl Dec 2013 #14