Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,287 posts)
16. It's the two frames immediately before and after the hit
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 04:27 AM
Dec 2012

... and what it shows is that the head snapped forward immediately after the hit, not "back and to the left." Several people have done precise analyses (see the Google search link) that came up with about 2 to 2.5 inches forward. As the bullet traversed the head, it slowed down, and by the law of momentum conservation, the momentum that the bullet lost by slowing down was instantaneously transferred to the head. The important point is that the bullet transferred momentum to the head only while it was in contact with the head. Since it is already long gone by that second frame, the bullet cannot impart any more momentum to the head after that second frame. The "back and to the left" motion, however, starts two frames after the hit and it accelerates for several frames, and neither of those facts can be explained by momentum transfer from the bullet. Therefore, that forward head snap unambiguously implies that the shot came from behind.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There was no trace.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #1
The origin of the shot is not an "assumption" William Seger Dec 2012 #2
Oh my Gawd.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #3
Posner, depending on where he is... says different things about this... MrMickeysMom Dec 2012 #5
Well, you're the one who brought up the "jerk & jettison to the rear" nonsense William Seger Dec 2012 #6
Contributing to the tedious nature of discussion concerning the Kennedy assassination are people... cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #8
Ok, I'll bite..... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #9
In your own words... cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #10
I see.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #15
Nope William Seger Dec 2012 #17
If I look.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #18
Nope William Seger Dec 2012 #20
No witty retort? cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #11
Have been.... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #12
Happy Holidays to you as well. n/t cherokeeprogressive Dec 2012 #13
Let's back up here for a second... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #14
It's the two frames immediately before and after the hit William Seger Dec 2012 #16
This is dependent... Frank_Norris_Lives Dec 2012 #19
Your explanation doesn't work William Seger Dec 2012 #21
Who said that? MrMickeysMom Dec 2012 #4
Well, there's a profound observation William Seger Dec 2012 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2020 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Arlen Specter did not pro...»Reply #16