Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Women's Rights & Issues

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ancianita

(39,557 posts)
Sun Apr 25, 2021, 10:33 AM Apr 2021

About the U.S. Military Code of Dress [View all]




While we get distracted with tweet fighting over "both sides do it" politics, both sides DO do it when they gender discriminate.

See the standard mess hall dinner dress here?

Making gender code dress "standard" doesn't make it right.

It's a distinction with a difference. Dress that disables equal freedom of movement standardizes INequality of performance.

The disabling of women by any other means -- clothing, bound feet, high heels, poorer quality clothing design, etc. -- is the same mentality that disables people of color's lawful representation -- crippling, cheating, enforced impoverishment, enforced consent, then calling them inferior -- is the male issue across the planet. Of course, as with racism, they can't say any of that.

I realize it's not always christian, but was just responding to a comment in this particular context. In male run religions it's their issue (called 'culture,' 'tradition,' or any other cover name) -- to 'declare,' 'name,' 'brand,' then dress code half of the population to publicly mark them as spiritually inferior -- across continents. Not all and not always, of course, but enough to maintain gender hierarchy.

The ugly truth is that present 'systems' of governance of bodies (enforced free labor and fucking) without their consent ("Control your women." "Rule of thumb: keep them in hand, rein them in. Make them love their masters" ) are the old school illegitimate systems of forced male supremacy, forced on those who won't kill them in self defense, but run, instead. That armed women in the military are still raped tells us all we need to know about males who groom and train each other to not tolerate equality. Force and death threat maintain dominance.

The US Military should be disgusted to carry such Iron Age baggage in the 21st Century.

I doubt that male brass (or SECDEF Austin) will change the gender inequality in the military.
Women and their 'allies' in the military will have to change it along with the UCMJ.

I picture a President Harris, CiC, having her Secretary of Defense, a former female general, order an all-forces stand down order to get to the bottom of sexist practices, policies and unreported crimes.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wish I could rec plus several gazillion! Thie issues that you bring up do not receive anywhere niyad Apr 2021 #1
Photos of military dress of females in the Israeli military would be good to see, too. ancianita Apr 2021 #2
Makes absolutely no sense for anyone to be attired in a dress for the military. LiberalFighter Apr 2021 #3
So the Army gives women the choice qazplm135 Apr 2021 #4
The Air Force does as well DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2021 #5
By all appearances a choice seems fine if men can have the same choice. ancianita Apr 2021 #6
You aren't wearing your dress uniform qazplm135 Apr 2021 #10
I know that. What if a non combat zone is attacked, is the question. ancianita Apr 2021 #11
What if aliens invade?! qazplm135 Apr 2021 #14
Haha okay, fine. On a daily basis I'd call one kind of dress 'one less thing'. ancianita Apr 2021 #15
Do men get to choose a skirt? CrispyQ Apr 2021 #9
Yeezy does -- Givenchy! So does Vin Diesel. ancianita Apr 2021 #12
My USAF sergeant granddaughter wears dress blue pants. quaint Apr 2021 #7
By choice? Or by dress standard for both genders? ancianita Apr 2021 #8
I don't know but plan to find out. quaint Apr 2021 #13
I'm confused as to why qazplm135 Apr 2021 #16
More choice isn't better if the "choice" repeats a gendered civilian look ancianita Apr 2021 #17
the choice qazplm135 Apr 2021 #18
Fine. I accept your arguments and see nothing wrong with the meaning of 'choice' here. ancianita Apr 2021 #19
I'll give you credit qazplm135 Apr 2021 #20
In my case ancianita Apr 2021 #21
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»About the U.S. Military C...»Reply #0