Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(109,653 posts)
5. No, gluten isn't required to be listed anywhere, including food.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 04:12 PM
Aug 2015

Some manufacturers do, some don't. And they have different standards for doing so. So they might claim "NO GLUTEN INGREDIENTS," for example, leaving open the possibility that the food was processed in a machine dusted with gluten-containing flour. This can be okay for some gluten-intolerant people but not for people who have an anaphylactoid reaction to gluten.

Labeling wheat isn't enough because gluten is in other grains, too (barley and rye).

There's a reason gluten isn't listed. Ted Kennedy worked for twenty years to finally get the labeling bill through, so the "top allergens" would have to be labeled. But the only way he could get the food processors to stop fighting it was by taking gluten off the list. So even though more people have a problem with gluten than with several of the other ingredients, gluten was removed from the list.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Chronic Health Conditions Discussion and Support»For the gluten sensitive,...»Reply #5