Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
1. I have participated in both.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 12:17 AM
Apr 2016

I did 23andme prior to the FDA getting involved. Those issues seem to now be resolved. The health information has been beneficial to me.

I found more specificity in the 23andme report than with Ancestry. You get information on maternal and paternal DNA as well. So I got the specific haplogroup K for my mother for instance which was never given at Ancestry. I also signed up to be contacted when a relative also does their DNA. I have greatly expanded my family tree with this information and made many contacts. This has been more specific than at Ancestry. Ancestry also only provides estimates and percentages for the basic test. It might be more specific in a different test but I don't know.

I have my tree there but I hate the constant costs for different things.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»DNA test: Ancestry vs 23a...»Reply #1