Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

raccoon

(31,582 posts)
5. I'm reading a book called THE SHORT AMERICAN CENTURY:A POSTMORTEM.
Thu Feb 27, 2020, 08:42 AM
Feb 2020

Edited by Andrew J Bacevich.

In chapter 2, “the origins and uses of American hyper power” by David M Kennedy, he writes about the use of “ Strategic bombing“ in Europe. Against Germany.

“for those who could carry it off, strategic bombing promised rich rewards: a brief war, with relatively few casualties, and minimum disruption of one’s own social and economic structure.” (Bacevich, p 22). Then on p. 30-31, “While Japan in the first half of 1945 adopted a primitive wind–driven technology [balloons carrying firebombs] in a last desperate effort to strike at the Americans in their heartland, huge B-29 bomber streams flew nightly to Japan from the Mariana islands.”

So I started thinking, why couldn’t they do the
strategic bombing on Japan as well? And I thought that might be because of the distance to the Japanese home islands from wherever the Americans could have a base. Until much later in the war.

I am certainly no expert on military strategy or American bombers in WWII, so chime in if you think otherwise.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»How far could a WWII Amer...»Reply #5