Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dawg

(10,777 posts)
1. I think Lincoln realized it would eventually unravel the whole country.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 10:45 AM
Nov 2012

Once you set a precedent that a state can just secede when it loses an election or something happens that it doesn't like, pretty soon you don't have a country anymore. Before you know it, Maine will be seceding because of the tax rate on lobsters or New York will be seceding because they don't think they are being fairly represented due to having the same amount of Senators as Rhode Island.

Certainly Kentucky, Maryland and Missouri were doubtful to stick around through another Presidential election.

As a collection of smaller nations, we would never have become the world power that we are today. I think Lincoln showed great foresight in doing what he did.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think Lincoln realized it would eventually unravel the whole country. dawg Nov 2012 #1
The New England pols tried to force a confrontation with Leontius Nov 2012 #4
Actually, no Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2012 #7
You fail to mention any of the previous attempts by New England pols Leontius Dec 2012 #8
I didn't mention them because there weren't any Fortinbras Armstrong Dec 2012 #9
Rufus King, Timothy Pickering, Theodore Sedgwick, New Orleans and Mississippi navigation, Leontius Dec 2012 #11
I just looked those up Fortinbras Armstrong Dec 2012 #12
I think you're right there... 47of74 Mar 2013 #13
some answers: Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #2
Both sides were wrong on the timing. SnohoDem Nov 2012 #3
Historians have quite recently upped that figure to well over 700,000 Adsos Letter Mar 2013 #15
Last Great Hope joseph abbott Nov 2012 #5
Yup. Secession was widely viewed as treason in the North. Adsos Letter Mar 2013 #16
Cotton was 60-80% of US export products in the Antebellum. You wanna let that go? Bucky Nov 2012 #6
Go reread the Gettysburg Address: that stuff mattered to people struggle4progress Dec 2012 #10
Fort Sumter? Democracyinkind Mar 2013 #14
kicking this thread-- the South was deeply divided and the North was well aware of it carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #17
The South vs. The South... Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #18
Freehling... Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #19
I agree. Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #20
Ahh.. I love Martigny! Just thinking about it makes me want to leave work and go there... Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»Why didn't the North let ...»Reply #1