Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
20. I agree.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jun 2013

Yes, both volumes of The Road to Disunion were on my reading list. I have to admit, I preferred the writing style in the second over the first, but I certainly enjoyed both. I remember thinking that his first couple of chapters in the second volume were fine examples of how overviews and introductions should be done, and too often aren't.

Two other works whose writing style I admire are: Eric Foner's Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men, and Gordon Rhea's three-volume work on Grant's 1864 Overland Campaign. Technically, Rhea isn't a Historian but he performs like one of the best in making comprehensible, and engaging, all the complex of actors and actions in that series of battles.

I see from your profile that you are an ex-pat living in Switzerland. We were fortunate enough to spend a couple of weeks in Martigny a few years ago, and thoroughly enjoyed the experience!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think Lincoln realized it would eventually unravel the whole country. dawg Nov 2012 #1
The New England pols tried to force a confrontation with Leontius Nov 2012 #4
Actually, no Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2012 #7
You fail to mention any of the previous attempts by New England pols Leontius Dec 2012 #8
I didn't mention them because there weren't any Fortinbras Armstrong Dec 2012 #9
Rufus King, Timothy Pickering, Theodore Sedgwick, New Orleans and Mississippi navigation, Leontius Dec 2012 #11
I just looked those up Fortinbras Armstrong Dec 2012 #12
I think you're right there... 47of74 Mar 2013 #13
some answers: Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #2
Both sides were wrong on the timing. SnohoDem Nov 2012 #3
Historians have quite recently upped that figure to well over 700,000 Adsos Letter Mar 2013 #15
Last Great Hope joseph abbott Nov 2012 #5
Yup. Secession was widely viewed as treason in the North. Adsos Letter Mar 2013 #16
Cotton was 60-80% of US export products in the Antebellum. You wanna let that go? Bucky Nov 2012 #6
Go reread the Gettysburg Address: that stuff mattered to people struggle4progress Dec 2012 #10
Fort Sumter? Democracyinkind Mar 2013 #14
kicking this thread-- the South was deeply divided and the North was well aware of it carolinayellowdog Jun 2013 #17
The South vs. The South... Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #18
Freehling... Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #19
I agree. Adsos Letter Jun 2013 #20
Ahh.. I love Martigny! Just thinking about it makes me want to leave work and go there... Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»Why didn't the North let ...»Reply #20