Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Girard442

(6,504 posts)
2. I believe they have that wrong.
Mon Aug 29, 2022, 03:09 PM
Aug 2022

The text of 1A:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



1A specifically states that government can discriminate against religion. There is no doctrine of separation of food and state, or separation of banking and state, or even separation of anal sex and state. Religion is singled out as something that government can't get entangled with. What this means is that when government is handing out goodies, it's specifically prohibited from handing out goodies to religious institutions -- but not prohibited from handing out goodies to, say, The Anal Sex Club. Free Astroglide!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»9th Cir. holds 2-1 Fellow...»Reply #2