Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beardown

(363 posts)
1. SecMo was quicker on the draw then I was.
Sat Oct 17, 2015, 10:48 AM
Oct 2015

I deleted my post about this so I'll add my comments here.

For some odd reason all the posts seem to stray off talking about whether or not the Oregon CC shooter was white and christian and if the media suppressed his picture, etc.

Anyway, back to the subject of the thread.

So these are measures I'm behind. Are any classic trojan horses or double speak for "stricter penalties" mean national registry so they can find out who needs the penalties? Training requiring a series of courses that would make a Navy Seal faint?

I don't know that you can call many of the pro control posters here activists, but many sure seem to have problems with guns in particular and they sure seem to call for much more extreme measures than the above 3.

This has that slimey look to it like when repubs say we want to make SS more secure and they mean by reducing benefits, raising the age to 77, and exempting rich folks from paying any SS tax as this will motivate poor slum kids to work harder to become rich.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»X-Post from GDP: If you'...»Reply #1