Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
31. A little tricky due to the timing, but not hard to figure out...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:48 PM
Oct 2015

Articles Of Confederation: 1781 - 1789

"..but every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of filed pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage"

Constitution: Ratified 1788/89
"The Congress shall have Power...
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;"


What would become the 2nd amendment was authored June-Sept 1789, ratified in 1791.
So it seems the Constitution lists the federal regulations concerning the Militia at that time; at least until the Militia Acts of 1792, when exactly how the Militias would be "well-regulated", i.e. what "organizing, arming, and disciplining" the Militias would actually entail.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Search engines are available to all Doubledee Oct 2015 #1
And for clarity's sake, 2A recognized an individual right to keep and bear arms. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #15
the devil in the details Doubledee Oct 2015 #22
I am not confused. That was the language of the day. What is clear: Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #27
Lets agree Doubledee Oct 2015 #28
That's fine. That kind of language re: 2A is found in some state constitutions, Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #30
That they should be able to load and fire guns. immoderate Oct 2015 #2
Perhaps we should enlist members of this militia to fight ISIS. LonePirate Oct 2015 #3
Any comments concerning the OP? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #6
Make militia membership mandatory for gun ownership then send militia members overseas to fight ISIS LonePirate Oct 2015 #9
Good, you keep saying that and let us know when anything changes DonP Oct 2015 #10
The more that gundamentalists hate an idea, the more it needs to be inplemented. LonePirate Oct 2015 #12
Gee, Pirate, are you "terrorized?" Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #13
Only people who suck at math are "terrorized." Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #16
The same could be said for gundamentalists who own based on fears of crimes that will never happen. LonePirate Oct 2015 #17
Let's see, gun crime and murders are about half what they were in 1994 DonP Oct 2015 #18
chest puffing about the GOP congress jimmy the one Oct 2015 #24
I don't disagree, actually. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #19
pb bullets for sale, cheap jimmy the one Oct 2015 #25
I'll have to check. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #26
BTDT /nt sarisataka Oct 2015 #11
Actually, if the militia were called up for that, you would be on the list. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #14
Constitutional rights were earned from 1775 to 1783. beardown Oct 2015 #20
The militia is for securing a free state. Expeditionary campaigns are for the military. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #23
That has nothing to do with the OP. What, if any, regulations were placed on the militia when the Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #29
So your position is to put boots on the ground in the Middle East. n/t krispos42 Oct 2015 #21
Its a popular but incorrect notion, among some folks. beevul Oct 2015 #4
That phrase actually jeepers Oct 2015 #5
I think it's more of a rationale than it is a precondition. [nt] Jester Messiah Oct 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #8
A little tricky due to the timing, but not hard to figure out... jmg257 Oct 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»I keep hearing "well...»Reply #31