Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,608 posts)
14. spin???
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 03:22 PM
Nov 2015
"We need to get to our jobs."

Call a taxi???


"Guns are said to be for "sport" mostly and the 1 in 5000 chance for self defense."

Regardless of the personal reason for speaking, owning a gun, attending a religious service, not self-incriminating, etc. these are RIGHTS; reasons are not required.


"And my 3 year old is unlikely to get into my car and kill me with it."

Since driving on a public highway is a privilege, your 3 year old isn't allowed to do that. You are bound (by law) to take precautions against that. If you're not a moron and taking equivalent precautions with your guns, the chance that your 3 year old will kill you are non-existent.

"Regulation and registration are not onerous requirements."

Regulation is not and we have plenty of those.
Registration is.


Expand your thinking.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What if we treated car owners like gun owners... [View all] virginia mountainman Nov 2015 OP
Interesting spin jehop61 Nov 2015 #1
Gun control advocates are always telling us we should regulate guns like we do cars...n/t Kang Colby Nov 2015 #7
There are more than 30 federally mandated safety features for the interior of a car. flamin lib Dec 2015 #23
I'm OK with that. I'd then be able to legally take that gun into *all* states, and would no longer.. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #24
Problems, here... Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #10
Your logic jehop61 Nov 2015 #12
"Your logic cannot be refuted by me." FTFY... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #13
Please re-read. And kindly quit attacking progressives in DU. Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #16
All I know jehop61 Dec 2015 #17
You don't 'know' these things, you *believe* them- and that's fine friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #18
Fact jehop61 Dec 2015 #19
So those right wing liars at the FBI are all wrong I guess? DonP Dec 2015 #20
How *dare* you derail that poster's religious proselytizing with inconvenient facts! friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #21
Well, everybody knows the DoJ under Eric Holder was pro gun and right wing DonP Dec 2015 #22
spin??? discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2015 #14
fine. lets require liability insurance on each gun, like we do for cars! nt msongs Nov 2015 #2
What exactly will mandatory liability insurance accomplish that's different than now? branford Nov 2015 #3
Liability insurance IS OPTIONAL in some states.. virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #5
Biggest seller of firearm related insurance? The NRA thanks you for the business and revenue. DonP Nov 2015 #8
Liability insurance is only required if you drive the car on public roads. Angleae Nov 2015 #9
Jesus, doesn't the NRA get enough money? Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #11
My company owns 20 cars without any insurance Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #25
a federal firearms license is not to own a gun but to buy and sell them. hollysmom Nov 2015 #4
to sell firearms, you need all of what you listed in addition to an FFL gejohnston Nov 2015 #6
I don't think you need a fixed location. that is why they are checking the houses. hollysmom Nov 2015 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»What if we treated car ow...»Reply #14