Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)

7. Yeah, no kidding.

Reply to DonP (Reply #6)

Mon Dec 7, 2015, 06:53 PM

Dec 2015

What do you think that section is supposed to mean? I have no clue. You could argue it only applies to barrel shrouds or you could argue it applies to any sort of foregrip or wood stock extension under the barrel. If you take the latter interpretation all semi automatic rifles are banned.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AW ban upheld Illinois [View all] jimmy the one Dec 2015 OP

So ... Straw Man Dec 2015 #1

It appears Illinois needs a preemption law. N/T beevul Dec 2015 #2

Illinois has preemption, but ... DonP Dec 2015 #3

Actually a weird written ordinance, even for an AWB. jmg257 Dec 2015 #4

What does this mean? Anyone know? Kang Colby Dec 2015 #5

It sounds like they consulted with Congress to draft the law DonP Dec 2015 #6

Yeah, no kidding. Kang Colby Dec 2015 #7

Probably trying to ban vertical foregrips, but not pump shotguns? DonP Dec 2015 #8

"Similar bans are in effect in California" DonP Dec 2015 #9

what if, fed awb renewed in 2004 jimmy the one Dec 2015 #10

Not if it was renewed as written hack89 Dec 2015 #11