Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

S_B_Jackson

(906 posts)
1. As the article says, "While the court issued no ruling and set no precedent"
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 08:14 AM
Dec 2015

in denying certoriari, it seems that gun control mavens cannot help but insert their own pet interpretations.

The fact is that the matter is in flux following the 2008 ruling in Heller and 2010's McDonald ruling and a reasonable court may find that the time simply is not appropriate for them to enter a new decision. In Illinois, for instance, there is a bill pending in the state legislature which would impose a state-preemption of local gun control ordinances with no municipal or county ordinances allowed which exceed state standards and which would invalidate Highland Park's ordinance completely.

Essentially, nothing has changed as a result of the USSC's non-ruling.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»How the gun lobby outsmar...»Reply #1