Gun Control & RKBA

randys1

(16,286 posts)

10. So am I , but I dont attack Hillary you see because I am pretty sure

Wed Jan 6, 2016, 07:21 PM

Jan 2016

of two things

1. she will likely be the nominee and if so I want as little negatives on her as possible as the alternative could literally be life and death for many

2. if she isnt the nominee Bernie will need and WANT her in his corner, big time, count on it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Read and discuss.... [View all] ileus Jan 2016 OP

So this comment is a lie? randys1 Jan 2016 #1

I would say so Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #2

Oy, so when the reported facts dont jive with what you believe, you call it a lie? randys1 Jan 2016 #3

yes having been to many gun shows Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #4

Question randys1 Jan 2016 #5

of course I do Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #6

Good, but why take a swipe at the likely nominee of our party? What does it accomplish? randys1 Jan 2016 #7

because I am not voting for her Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #8

So am I , but I dont attack Hillary you see because I am pretty sure randys1 Jan 2016 #10

good for you Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #12

Nope, not one. I have asked honest questions about his gun stance and something about the randys1 Jan 2016 #13

My problem with Hillary as the presumptive candidate Big_Mike Jan 2016 #21

That is the problem the right has with Hillary. randys1 Jan 2016 #37

Randy, for all my military career, I had access to classified material Big_Mike Jan 2016 #45

Does your support for gay rights, minority rights and women's rights include Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #24

FYI: Duckhunter935 is blocked from posting SecularMotion Jan 2016 #26

does that matter Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #27

Lots of thin skinned groups out there. ileus Jan 2016 #32

I get it, I am just trying to create bridges. If GGJohn and I can become friends, and we randys1 Jan 2016 #33

Like the republicans in Congress, the anti-regulation crowd are RW obstructionists. SecularMotion Jan 2016 #34

very true, thanks Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #35

You sir, are a person to emulate. I would that more people here in DU overall felt that way Big_Mike Jan 2016 #46

It's that the reporter's assertion is incredibly far-fetched. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #9

and the article seems to state Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #11

Then no way most of the dealers weren't FFLs. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #16

Randys1: Are you now or have you ever been a liberal? Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #17

love it Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #18

Some people think they are in charge of moral interrogation. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #19

That one seems to think he is the final authority on all things liberal Lurks Often Jan 2016 #28

Sorry, we already have one that thinks they are the host and resident Zampolit DonP Jan 2016 #29

This one doesn't restrict himself Gun Control & RKBA Lurks Often Jan 2016 #36

On the plus side he doesn't appear to be a "Calculuz" teacher DonP Jan 2016 #38

Our calculuz professor is back from another vacation Lurks Often Jan 2016 #39

He's been going on a lot of those lately DonP Jan 2016 #40

Hah, the only question is how long he lasts Lurks Often Jan 2016 #41

not long Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #42

Last time he was gone again in 3 or 4 days. DonP Jan 2016 #43

Yes. ileus Jan 2016 #14

very nice, that article in the OP has so many errors Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #15

I even doubt the "enough firepower to blow a groundhog away from 100 yards" statement. ileus Jan 2016 #22

Almost certainly. krispos42 Jan 2016 #20

Finally proof of at least one FFL dealer. ileus Jan 2016 #23

looks like two Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #25

There was probably 100 Vendors with FFLs ileus Jan 2016 #30

at the least with that many tables. Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #31

Strange.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #44