Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Read and discuss.... [View all]

Big_Mike

(509 posts)
45. Randy, for all my military career, I had access to classified material
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 01:37 AM
Jan 2016

And for the last 3 years, I had daily access to TS/SCI material. I was read into some of the same compartments that she, as SecState, was read into. I am absolutely certain that had I done 1/100th of what has already been spread over the newspapers, I would have had my clearance pulled, been read my rights, and prosecuted under the appropriate regulations pertaining to national security.

I had a kid that worked for me place classified material on top of his car so he could unlock his door to transport the material to a classified location, sit down in the car, and drive off with the material still on his roof. It blew off, and was found by a German cleaning lady, whose father just happened to be mayor of a town in Hungary, then behind the Iron Curtain. Said kid was reduced to the lowest enlisted rank and was never again promoted while he continued to serve.

I personally know of multiple cases where violations of security happened, and the people involved were basically destroyed in place. Some simply got bad discharges and went home, others had to stop by Ft. Leavenworth for a few or 20 years before going home.

This is VERY serious. Even Snowden says so. If Hillary Clinton does not go to trial about this, it will cause unbelievable damage to our national security, simply because everyone will then be able to say "She got away with it. Why am I being charged?" And this will stick. Scum like Jonathan Pollard did 25 years in part for essentially what she is accused of doing. She is, of course, not a spy; but should face charges for the negligent handling of classified material. Now, if she goes to trial and wins, great. She is a smart and experienced woman, one whom I would much rather see as Secretary of the UN than President Obama, if truth be told. I just don't think she will be able to run for POTUS this go around. I feel strongly that if Attorney General Lynch does not prefer charges, that will start the bells officially tolling for the concept of one law for all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Read and discuss.... [View all] ileus Jan 2016 OP
So this comment is a lie? randys1 Jan 2016 #1
I would say so Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #2
Oy, so when the reported facts dont jive with what you believe, you call it a lie? randys1 Jan 2016 #3
yes having been to many gun shows Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #4
Question randys1 Jan 2016 #5
of course I do Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #6
Good, but why take a swipe at the likely nominee of our party? What does it accomplish? randys1 Jan 2016 #7
because I am not voting for her Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #8
So am I , but I dont attack Hillary you see because I am pretty sure randys1 Jan 2016 #10
good for you Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #12
Nope, not one. I have asked honest questions about his gun stance and something about the randys1 Jan 2016 #13
My problem with Hillary as the presumptive candidate Big_Mike Jan 2016 #21
That is the problem the right has with Hillary. randys1 Jan 2016 #37
Randy, for all my military career, I had access to classified material Big_Mike Jan 2016 #45
Does your support for gay rights, minority rights and women's rights include Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #24
FYI: Duckhunter935 is blocked from posting SecularMotion Jan 2016 #26
does that matter Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #27
Lots of thin skinned groups out there. ileus Jan 2016 #32
I get it, I am just trying to create bridges. If GGJohn and I can become friends, and we randys1 Jan 2016 #33
Like the republicans in Congress, the anti-regulation crowd are RW obstructionists. SecularMotion Jan 2016 #34
very true, thanks Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #35
You sir, are a person to emulate. I would that more people here in DU overall felt that way Big_Mike Jan 2016 #46
It's that the reporter's assertion is incredibly far-fetched. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #9
and the article seems to state Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #11
Then no way most of the dealers weren't FFLs. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #16
Randys1: Are you now or have you ever been a liberal? Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #17
love it Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #18
Some people think they are in charge of moral interrogation. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #19
That one seems to think he is the final authority on all things liberal Lurks Often Jan 2016 #28
Sorry, we already have one that thinks they are the host and resident Zampolit DonP Jan 2016 #29
This one doesn't restrict himself Gun Control & RKBA Lurks Often Jan 2016 #36
On the plus side he doesn't appear to be a "Calculuz" teacher DonP Jan 2016 #38
Our calculuz professor is back from another vacation Lurks Often Jan 2016 #39
He's been going on a lot of those lately DonP Jan 2016 #40
Hah, the only question is how long he lasts Lurks Often Jan 2016 #41
not long Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #42
Last time he was gone again in 3 or 4 days. DonP Jan 2016 #43
Yes. ileus Jan 2016 #14
very nice, that article in the OP has so many errors Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #15
I even doubt the "enough firepower to blow a groundhog away from 100 yards" statement. ileus Jan 2016 #22
Almost certainly. krispos42 Jan 2016 #20
Finally proof of at least one FFL dealer. ileus Jan 2016 #23
looks like two Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #25
There was probably 100 Vendors with FFLs ileus Jan 2016 #30
at the least with that many tables. Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #31
Strange.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Read and discuss....»Reply #45