Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,605 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 04:14 PM Jan 2016

The firearm-homicde rate is apparrently not tied to restrictive firearm laws [View all]

For 2010 DC and Maryland are 2 of only 4 areas with firearm murder rates above the national average for murder (4.8 per 100,000). They are both also in the bottom of the Guns & Ammo list for firearms friendly laws. At the same time five states among the top 12 friendliest in firearm laws are also among the states with firearm murder rates less than a third of the national average for murder overall. I'm referring to Vermont, Utah, Wyoming, New Hampshire and Montana.

The simplest conclusion is that gun-control laws don't affect gun murder rates very much.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But some want tax funding to prove otherwise. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #1
It is my opinion that... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #5
They don't want 'the simplest conclusion'. beevul Jan 2016 #2
re: "This is deliberate and calculated." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #6
No... Puha Ekapi Jan 2016 #7
DUzy discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #8
Huh? EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #3
Well I was able to find 4 on wikipedia discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #4
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The firearm-homicde rate ...»Reply #0