Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beardown

(363 posts)
9. Constitution granted the right, not the second
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:29 AM
Feb 2016

The right would be there regardless of the second. The BOR was only meant to re-enforce or clarify the specific rights mentioned. Did a horrible job.

I've read debates around the writing of the BOR and a few astute members said why add a BOR stating a right already granted in the Constitution as it might confuse the issue.

Now I'm off to put some buckets out to catch my next batch of Scotch rain.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The Fatally Flawed Second...»Reply #9