Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Mandatory gun insurance before lawmakers in 4 states [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,608 posts)10. General Correction here addressing Major fail
"We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns," Maloney said at the time of the bill's introduction. "The results are clear: car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade, but gun fatalities continue to rise."
Where is insurance required to own a car? What country is she talking about? I might understand insurance for those who want to carry in public but to OWN? No.
Motor vehicle fatalities are dropping but I don't see how that has anything to do with car insurance. Motor vehicle fatalities were on the rise from 1999 to 2002 but insurance has been mandatory since the '70s. This is just nonsense.
Any comment from you on this blatant batch of non-logic and lies you posted?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Well, that's nice. Now I'll have to buy insurance to cover a gun I've owned since 1988.
In_The_Wind
Feb 2016
#1
I've never seen any literature from the NRA's "Guns for Everyone" campaign. Do you have any links?
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2016
#6
That's a pretty bold misrepresentation, particularly in context of your OP claiming
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2016
#15
No, Duckhunter935, it is not. However if it is operated on public property it is.
flamin lib
Feb 2016
#31
Well, Duckhunter935, you know full well that the purpose of auto insurance isn't to
flamin lib
Feb 2016
#32
Seeing as you are a gun dealer, I have a couple of questions about insurance for you:
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#41
Since our self-declared gun dealer interlocutor has also stated that they hate the PLCAA...
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#46
Not really, it's more to illustrate how the controllers fold when things get tough
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#48
To clarify, a C&R FFL does NOT authorize the holder to operate a firearms business
Marengo
Feb 2016
#49
He would still most likely have insurance, as his collection has monetary value
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#50
Religious types don't change their behavior when confronted with empirical evidence
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#42
Ah, means-testing to discourage the working class and minorities from owning guns.
benEzra
Feb 2016
#54