Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
8. "...more often than you might think?" Well, here is the comparative data?
Mon May 2, 2016, 04:58 PM
May 2016

What were the numbers five years ago? 10? 20?

Twenty-three (23) instances in a year with a population of 310,000,000+ people is a very small number.

I welcme a little comparison data to show a trend which somehow lights up the radar picking up 23. Going from eighteen (18) to twenty-three (23) doesn't seem to be a sea-change. BTW, in the dodge ball reporting, it is unclear how many of the 23 were fatalities; in any case, it's all thrown into the stew of eighteen-or-younger the news media chooses to use as a marker. (IIRC, the National Safety Council defines "child" as 15 yoa or younger for children killed in gun accidents.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Toddlers have shot at lea...»Reply #8