Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:48 AM Jun 2016

Guns? Bombs? [View all]

The Orlando massacre generated many gun-related comments here at DU. No surprise there, of course.

And it got me thinking. I personally would favor a ban of all semi-automatic weapons, period. I would keep revolvers, breech-loading long guns, and bolt-action rifles legal. I think a semi-auto ban would pass judicial muster, as the Second Amendment does contain the phrase "well-regulated".

Getting such a ban passed would be very difficult, I know.

But that's not the main topic of my post. Let's suppose for a moment that my proposal became law, and semi-autos became very difficult to obtain. What then would prevent a terrorist from just switching over to homemade bombs? As we saw from the Boston Marathon bombing, such devices can be quite lethal.

Maybe this post is just rambling, as I don't have a solution to the bomb problem.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns? Bombs? [View all] Shemp Howard Jun 2016 OP
Anything can be a weapon...but here we're willing to give up freedom for nothing. ileus Jun 2016 #1
Guns are easy. Bombs are hard. Jerry442 Jun 2016 #2
Tell that to the Tsarnaev brothers. Sure, it may be "easier" to insert a magizine jonno99 Jun 2016 #7
re: "Bombs are hard" discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #8
"But Hammurabi, what's the point of outlawing evil acts?" Jerry442 Jun 2016 #9
Two little Latin phrases. Straw Man Jun 2016 #10
The purpose of the law is to be used as a criterion by the due process to determine... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #14
Evil acts are already outlawed. You're trying to outlaw things that scare you. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #19
Semi-auto ban would not pass judicial muster, as the 2nd also contains that whole jmg257 Jun 2016 #3
Just in case you hadn't noticed... Jerry442 Jun 2016 #11
Yes - understood. Cheers! nt jmg257 Jun 2016 #12
full autos are banned for civilians in most if not all of Europe gejohnston Jun 2016 #4
Boston? Try Oklahoma City & the first attack on the World Trade Center (1993). JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #5
For that matter the second attack used... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #15
If not bombs, then arson. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #6
Boston was pretty weak bomb compared to Iraq DashOneBravo Jun 2016 #13
Evil has this way of mutating and growing. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #16
I agree it's evil DashOneBravo Jun 2016 #17
I hope our military has stepped up security at the ordinance storage facilities. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #18
Never underestimate the military abilities DashOneBravo Jun 2016 #20
You don't need bombs Matrosov Jun 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Guns? Bombs?»Reply #0