Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,605 posts)
1. I call it the Stewart philosophy.
Sat Dec 21, 2019, 06:50 PM
Dec 2019

Stewart, commenting on pornography, said "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description, and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."

IMHO, the law must serve as the criterion to determine guilt in a criminal trial. For that purpose, an impartial jury representative of the accused as being of his or her peers, must understand the law. Laws must not be vague but rather must be deterministic.

It is a sad thing that the idea of gun-control has led so many freedom minded Democrats to this point as expressed by Republican Justice Potter Stewart.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Massachusetts AG Healey f...»Reply #1