Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,650 posts)
2. I found a graph.
Sun Jan 30, 2022, 09:25 AM
Jan 2022

To be clear, this insurance will pay on the gray shaded "Preventable/Accidental" section.
The "Undetermined" area may see some coverage as well; best guess would be a crap shoot.
Link- National Safety Council:
https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/guns/


This graph is 2020. The latest numbers from the CDC are for 2019.
(CDC) Unintentional (Includes undetermined) Firearm Injuries: 20,814 (Estimate)
https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nonfatal.html
(CDC) Unintentional Firearm Deaths: 486
https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html

I guess the 2020 numbers are close.

Something from the insurance industry: https://www.iii.org/article/background-on-gun-liability

Overview

The idea that insurance can help prevent deaths from firearms often rises to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness following mass shootings.

Advocates of the idea believe that if gun owners were required to purchase insurance, the cost of the insurance would provide them an incentive to own fewer firearms and/or more carefully store the firearms they own. However, no U.S. insurance company offers separate, stand-alone gun liability coverage. In considering whether insurance is an appropriate mechanism to prevent mass shootings, it is important to note that no insurer – primary or excess – provides liability coverage for illegal acts. Looking ahead, there is very little likelihood that insurers would develop such coverage.

Excess personal liability coverage for firearms owners is available, though typically only through membership in a firearms association.

Acts that are intended or expected to cause harm are also generally excluded, though some policies will provide coverage in cases for which bodily injury or property damage results from the use of “reasonable force” by an insured to protect persons or property. “Self-defense” coverage for firearms owners is available, though rarely found.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's already made one change RainCaster Jan 2022 #1
I found a graph. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2022 #2
I have no doubt it will have an effect sarisataka Jan 2022 #3
Which company was it that... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2022 #4
A few comments melm00se Jan 2022 #5
Details discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2022 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»San Jose becomes 1st in U...»Reply #2