Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Media

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(49,480 posts)
Sun Nov 6, 2016, 02:18 PM Nov 2016

Oh C'mon LA Times [View all]

A long editorial about CNN employing Donna Brazile.

Brazile unquestionably behaved in a duplicitous manner, and CNN was right to be upset. But the bigger problem, arguably, is that she and a raft of other political operatives from both major parties had contracts with CNN in the first place.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-clinton-cnn-fox-20161101-story.html

All the networks, including the "big three" with their Sunday shows have a panel with members clearly identified as partisan. Yesterday on CNN, there was David Axelrod and today, on ABC there was Alex Castellanos.

Chris Matthews often has Hugh Hewitt..

So why jump on Brazile? Yes, if she leaked questions - how did she have them? - she should be fired. But to jump on CNN for hiring her in the first place?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh C'mon LA Times [View all] question everything Nov 2016 OP
The la times is dying. Iliyah Nov 2016 #1
Why is the LA Times all over Donna Brazile? ladym55 Nov 2016 #2
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»Oh C'mon LA Times»Reply #0